首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Radiology >Evaluation of traumatic spinal canal stenosis in thoracolumbar burst fractures. A comparison of three methods for measuring the percent canal occlusion.
【24h】

Evaluation of traumatic spinal canal stenosis in thoracolumbar burst fractures. A comparison of three methods for measuring the percent canal occlusion.

机译:胸腰椎爆裂骨折中创伤性椎管狭窄的评估。三种测量根管阻塞百分比的方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Various percent canal occlusion measurement methods have been used to assess the spinal canal stenosis following a thoracolumbar burst fracture. However, there are no studies performed comparing these techniques. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability of three techniques used to measure the spinal canal stenosis in thoracolumbar burst fractures on lateral radiograph and CT scans, and to identify the most reliable and practical method of assessment. METHODS: Fifty preoperative lateral radiographs and axial computed tomography (CT) scans of thoracolumbar burst fractures were analyzed by five observers in two sessions. The three measurement techniques were tested: the ratio of sagittal diameter of spinal canal at the injury level to that at the adjacent level on lateral plain radiographs (Ratio 1) and on axial CT scans (Ratio 2); and the ratio of cross-sectional area of spinal canal at the injury level to that at the adjacent level on axial CT scans (Ratio 3). Interobserver and intraobserver reliability for each measure was assessed. RESULTS: Greater coefficient of variation (CV) of measurement was founded for the Ratio 1 obtained from lateral plain radiographs than the other two ratios (Ratio 2 and 3) from CT scans (P<0.05), while no differences of CV were noted between the Ratio 2 and Ratio 3 with CT scans (P>0.05). There was no significant improvement (P>0.05) of the interobserver agreement after a 3-month interval for all three methods. A high significant positive correlation was observed between Ratio 1 and Ratio 2, Ratio 1 and Ratio 3, and Ratio 2 and Ratio 3 (P<0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: CT scans are more reliable than plain radiographs in the evaluation of spinal canal occlusion in thoracolumbar burst fractures although the agreement might be acceptable for the latter. Measurement of sagittal diameter of spinal canal using CT scan might be a more reasonable choice than of cross-sectional area of spinal canal because of its simplicity and comparable measurement reliability.
机译:目的:各种胸腔阻塞测量方法已被用于评估胸腰椎爆裂性骨折后的椎管狭窄。但是,没有进行比较这些技术的研究。这项研究的目的是确定在横向X光片和CT扫描中测量胸腰椎爆裂性骨折椎管狭窄的三种技术的可靠性,并确定最可靠,最实用的评估方法。方法:五名观察员在两次会议中分析了胸腰椎爆裂骨折的50例术前侧位X线照片和轴向计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描。测试了三种测量技术:在外侧平片(比率1)和轴向CT扫描(比率2)上,损伤水平的椎管矢状径与邻近水平的矢状径之比。在轴向CT扫描中,损伤水平的椎管截面积与相邻水平的椎管截面积之比(比率3)。评估了每个措施的观察者间和观察者内可靠性。结果:侧向平片的比率1被确定为比CT扫描的其他两个比率(比率2和3)更大(P <0.05),而在两个之间没有发现差异CT扫描显示比率2和比率3(P> 0.05)。三种方法间隔3个月后,观察者间协议没有显着改善(P> 0.05)。在比率1和比率2,比率1和比率3以及比率2和比率3之间观察到高度显着的正相关(所有P均<0.05)。结论:在胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的椎管闭塞评估中,CT扫描比平片检查更可靠,尽管对于后者而言可以接受。由于其简单性和可比性的测量可靠性,使用CT扫描测量椎管矢状径可能比选择椎管截面积更合理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号