...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Radiology >Nodal status of malignant lymphoma in pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphatic pathways: comparison of integrated PET/CT with or without contrast enhancement.
【24h】

Nodal status of malignant lymphoma in pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphatic pathways: comparison of integrated PET/CT with or without contrast enhancement.

机译:盆腔和腹膜后淋巴途径的恶性淋巴瘤的淋巴结状态:合并或不合并造影剂增强的PET / CT比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of integrated contrast-enhanced positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT), as compared with non-contrasted PET/CT, in evaluating nodal status of malignant lymphoma in pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphatic pathways. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients (33 men and 33 women) with malignant lymphoma underwent staging with integrated CT and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)FDG) PET. Tumor types were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=26, 39%), follicular lymphoma (n=20, 30%), Hodgkin disease (n=16, 24%), and marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (n=4, 6%). Both non-contrasted PET/CT and contrast-enhanced PET/CT images were examined separately by two different qualified physicians for each imaging modality, and nodal status of pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphatic pathways was evaluated. Reference standard included follow-up with clinical, laboratory, and conventional CT findings. We compared diagnostic accuracy retrospectively on basis of per-patient and per-lesion analyses between two modalities using McNemar test, respectively. RESULTS: Nodal status of pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphatic pathways was more accurately determined on contrast-enhanced PET/CT (n=52, 79%) compared with non-contrasted PET/CT (n=47, 71%). Difference in the accuracy of nodal staging between non-contrasted PET/CT and contrast-enhanced PET/CT was significant (p=0.048). On basis of per-lesion analysis, contrast-enhanced PET/CT determined more accurately the status of external iliac lymph node (p=0.002), internal iliac lymph node (p<0.0001), and common iliac lymph node (p=0.002) compared with non-contrasted PET/CT. Diagnostic accuracies of paraaortic lymph node, aortocaval lymph node, and paracaval lymph node were similar by either non-contrasted PET/CT or contrast-enhanced PET/CT. CONCLUSION: Integrated contrast-enhanced PET/CT improves the diagnostic accuracy in evaluating nodal status of pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphatic pathways in patients with malignant lymphoma.
机译:目的:为了确定骨盆和腹膜后淋巴途径的恶性淋巴瘤的淋巴结转移状态,与无创PET / CT相比,确定增强的造影剂正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和计算机断层扫描(CT)的诊断准确性。材料与方法:66例恶性淋巴瘤患者(33例男性和33例女性)接受了CT和氟18-氟脱氧葡萄糖((18)FDG)PET联合分期。肿瘤类型为弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(n = 26,39%),滤泡性淋巴瘤(n = 20,30%),霍奇金病(n = 16,24%)和边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤(n = 4、6%)。由两名不同的合格医师分别检查了未造影的PET / CT和对比增强的PET / CT图像的每种成像方式,并评估了骨盆和腹膜后淋巴途径的淋巴结状态。参考标准包括对临床,实验室和常规CT检查结果的随访。我们分别根据使用McNemar检验的两种方法在每位患者和每位病灶分析的基础上,对诊断准确性进行了回顾性比较。结果:与未造影的PET / CT(n = 47,71%)相比,对比增强的PET / CT(n = 52,79%)能更准确地确定盆腔和腹膜后淋巴途径的淋巴结状态。非对比PET / CT和对比增强PET / CT的淋巴结分期准确性差异显着(p = 0.048)。根据病灶分析,对比增强的PET / CT可以更准确地确定external外淋巴结(p = 0.002),internal内淋巴结(p <0.0001)和common总淋巴结(p = 0.002)的状态。与未造影的PET / CT相比。非对比PET / CT或对比增强PET / CT的主动脉旁淋巴结,主动脉腔淋巴结和腔旁淋巴结的诊断准确性相似。结论:增强的PET / CT造影剂可提高恶性淋巴瘤患者盆腔和腹膜后淋巴通路淋巴结转移状态的诊断准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号