首页> 外文期刊>European journal of pain : >Gastrointestinal symptoms under opioid therapy: a prospective comparison of oral sustained-release hydromorphone, transdermal fentanyl, and transdermal buprenorphine.
【24h】

Gastrointestinal symptoms under opioid therapy: a prospective comparison of oral sustained-release hydromorphone, transdermal fentanyl, and transdermal buprenorphine.

机译:阿片类药物治疗的胃肠道症状:口服缓释氢吗啡酮,透皮芬太尼和透皮丁丙诺啡的前瞻性比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the effect of long-term treatment with oral sustained-release hydromorphone, transdermal fentanyl, and transdermal buprenorphine on nausea, emesis and constipation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Randomly selected outpatients with cancer pain receiving one of the study medications were enrolled in a prospective, open-labeled, controlled trial (n=174). Mobility, pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed directly and per selected item on the ECOG (Eastern Cancer Oncology Group), EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) questionnaires, NRS (Numerical Rating Scales), and analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Demographic and medical data were comparable in all groups. Only 15% of patients suffered from constipation. 59% took the prescribed laxatives. The incidence of stool free periods >72 h was significantly higher with transdermal opioids (transdermal fentanyl: 22%; transdermal buprenorphine: 21%; oral hydromorphone: 2%; p=0.003). 21% of patients revealed nausea and emesis. The mean NRS for nausea (transdermal fentanyl:1.3; transdermal buprenorphine: 1.2; oral hydromorphone: 1.5; p=0.6), the consumption of antiemetics (transdermal fentanyl: 42%; transdermal buprenorphine: 33%; oral hydromorphone: 36%; p=0.6) and laxatives (transdermal fentanyl:53%; transdermal buprenorphine:66%; oral hydromorphone: 61%; p=0.2) did not differ significantly, in contrast to the score for emesis (transdermal fentanyl: 16%; transdermal buprenorphine:13%; oral hydromorphone: 33%; p=0.02). Morphine equivalent opioid doses differed (mg/d transdermal fentanyl: 183; transdermal buprenorphine: 89; oral hydromorphone: 143; p=0.001), because of obvious tolerance varying after long-term treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal symptoms of cancer pain patients undergoing an opioid therapy are related to multifactorial causes. Transdermal opioids showed no benefit over oral controlled-release hydromorphone with regard to gastrointestinal symptoms. The conversion ratios for transdermal fentanyl, transdermal buprenorphine, and oral hydromorphone did not accord to the literature, because of differing occurrences of opioid tolerance after long-term therapy.
机译:简介:本试验的目的是评估口服持续释放氢吗啡酮,透皮芬太尼和透皮丁丙诺啡对恶心,呕吐和便秘的长期治疗效果。患者和方法:随机选择接受其中一种研究药物的癌症疼痛门诊患者,进行一项前瞻性,开放标签,对照试验(n = 174)。在ECOG(美国东部癌症肿瘤学组),EORTC(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织)问卷,NRS(数字评分量表)中,按选定项目直接评估了活动,疼痛和胃肠道症状,并进行了统计分析。结果:所有组的人口统计学和医学数据均具有可比性。仅有15%的患者患有便秘。 59%服用了规定的泻药。透皮阿片类药物的无便期> 72 h的发生率明显更高(透皮芬太尼:22%;丁丙诺啡透皮:21%;口服氢吗啡酮:2%; p = 0.003)。 21%的患者显示恶心和呕吐。恶心的平均NRS(经皮芬太尼:1.3;经皮丁丙诺啡:1.2;口服氢吗啡酮:1.5; p = 0.6),服用止吐药(经皮芬太尼:42%;经皮丁丙诺啡:33%;口服氢吗啡酮:36%; p = 0.6)和泻药(经皮芬太尼:53%;丁丙诺啡透皮:66%;氢吗啡酮:61%; p = 0.2)与呕吐得分(经皮芬太尼:16%;丁丙诺啡经皮: 13%;口服氢吗啡酮:33%; p = 0.02)。吗啡等效阿片类药物剂量有所不同(mg / d透皮芬太尼:183;透皮丁丙诺啡:89;口服氢吗啡酮:143; p = 0.001),因为长期治疗后耐受性明显不同。结论:接受阿片类药物治疗的癌症疼痛患者的胃肠道症状与多种原因有关。就胃肠道症状而言,经皮阿片类药物未显示优于口服控释氢吗啡酮。由于长期治疗后发生的阿片类药物耐受性不同,因此透皮芬太尼,透皮丁丙诺啡和口服氢吗啡酮的转化率与文献不符。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号