首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical pharmacology >Prescription and non-prescription medicine use in Denmark: association with socio-economic position.
【24h】

Prescription and non-prescription medicine use in Denmark: association with socio-economic position.

机译:丹麦的处方药和非处方药使用:与社会经济地位的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the association among different types of medicine use and different measures of socio-economic position (SEP) in one and the same general population. METHODS: Data from The Danish Health and Morbidity Survey 2000 were analysed. The survey was conducted by face-to-face interviews with a representative sample of the adult Danish population (n=16,690). The associations between prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) medicine use and education, occupation and income were assessed by logistic regression analyses. All analyses were adjusted for age, gender and two measures of health status. RESULTS: This cross-sectional analysis of medicine use in a large representative sample of the Danish population found greater use of prescription medicines among disability pensioners and "others" than in salaried employees. Disability pensioners and self-employed individuals used less OTC medicine than salaried employees. Individuals with low income used more prescription medicines but not more OTCmedicines, than those with high income. No major differences were found in prescription medicine use with respect to education, but men within the two middle educational groups tended to use prescription medicine less frequently than both lower and higher educated men. A similar trend was not found for women. OTC medicine use was not associated with education for either gender. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of prescription medicine use increases with declining SEP, after adjusting for health status. Such an association does not exist for OTC medicine use. The results show that the least affluent have access to prescription medicine. The difference between prescription and OTC medicine use may be explained by a compensation mechanism.
机译:目的:分析同一人群中不同类型的药物使用和不同的社会经济地位衡量标准之间的关联。方法:分析丹麦健康与发病率调查2000年的数据。该调查是通过对丹麦成年人口(n = 16,690)的代表性样本进行面对面访问而进行的。通过逻辑回归分析评估处方药和非处方药(OTC)与教育,职业和收入之间的关联。所有分析均针对年龄,性别和两项健康状况指标进行了调整。结果:对丹麦人群的大量代表性样本中药物使用的横断面分析发现,与领薪雇员相比,残疾养老金领取者和“其他”患者更多地使用处方药。残疾养老金领取者和自雇人士使用的非处方药比领薪工的人少。与高收入者相比,低收入者使用了更多的处方药,但没有更多的非处方药。在教育方面,处方药的使用没有发现重大差异,但是两个中等教育组的男性比低学历和高学历的男性更倾向于使用处方药。女性没有发现类似的趋势。非处方药的使用与这两种性别的教育都不相关。结论:在调整了健康状况之后,处方药的使用率随着SEP的降低而增加。对于OTC药物使用,这种关联并不存在。结果表明,最富裕的人可以使用处方药。处方药和非处方药的使用差异可以通过补偿机制来解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号