...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical nutrition >Assessment of habitual meal pattern and intake of foods, energy and nutrients in Swedish adolescent girls: comparison of diet history with 7-day record.
【24h】

Assessment of habitual meal pattern and intake of foods, energy and nutrients in Swedish adolescent girls: comparison of diet history with 7-day record.

机译:评估瑞典少女的惯常饮食模式和食物,能量和营养的摄入:饮食史与7天记录的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diet history (DH) method to an estimated 7-day record (7-d) concerning meal pattern and intake of foods, energy and nutrients. DESIGN: After the DH interview, subjects completed the 7-d. SETTING: School setting, Goteborg, Sweden. SUBJECTS: A total of 51 adolescent girls (15-16 y) recruited from 634 girls participating in The Goteborg Adolescence Study. RESULTS: Two-thirds of the girls had identical or similar main meal pattern, while the number of in-between meals was higher using DH (P<0.001). Breakfast was the meal that agreed best and dinner during weekends. Energy intake (EI) was 8% higher in DH compared to 7-d (P=0.056). The ratio EI to basal metabolic rate was 1.35 (1.14, 1.65) using DH and 1.26 (1.08, 1.52) using 7-d, indicating under-reporting in both methods. Intake of vegetables, juice, sweets, soft-drinks and jam did not differ between the methods, but for the rest of the intake DH estimates were higher (P<0.05). The calculated nutrient intake was higher by DH, withexception of fat and sucrose. For the main food groups, energy and nutrients, except alcohol, ranking was similar between the methods. Adjusted for EI (10 MJ), intake of fat and sucrose were lower and protein, calcium and fibre were higher by DH (P<0.01). EI did not differ for lunch and dinner, but was higher in breakfast and in-between meals using DH. Intake of foods and nutrients in lunches and meat and fish for lunch and dinner did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: The diet history seems to work well as a reference method for dietary assessments in this age group. SPONSORSHIP: The Swedish Medical Research Council (project B94-19X-04721-19A), the Swedish Mill Industry, The Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren Foundation and The Swedish Nutrition Foundation.
机译:目的:比较饮食史(DH)方法与估计的7天记录(7天)有关饮食模式和食物,能量和营养的摄入量。设计:在DH访谈之后,受试者完成了7天。地点:瑞典哥德堡的学校环境。受试者:从参加哥德堡青春期研究的634名女孩中招募了51名少女(15-16岁)。结果:三分之二的女孩具有相同或相似的主要进餐方式,而使用DH的中间进餐次数则更高(P <0.001)。早餐是最合算的一餐,而周末则是晚餐。与7天相比,DH的能量摄入(EI)高8%(P = 0.056)。使用DH的EI与基础代谢率之比为1.35(1.14,1.65),使用7-d的EI与基础代谢率之比为1.26(1.08,1.52),表明两种方法均未报告。两种方法中蔬菜,果汁,甜食,软饮料和果酱的摄入量没有差异,但是对于其余的摄入量,DH估计值较高(P <0.05)。除脂肪和蔗糖外,通过DH计算得出的营养摄入量更高。对于主要食物类别,能量和营养素(酒精除外)在两种方法之间的排名相似。调整EI(10 MJ)后,通过DH减少脂肪和蔗糖的摄入,并增加蛋白质,钙和纤维的摄入(P <0.01)。午餐和晚餐的EI没有差异,但是早餐和使用DH的中间餐的EI更高。午餐中食物和营养的摄入量以及午餐和晚餐中肉和鱼的摄入量没有差异。结论:饮食史似乎是该年龄组饮食评估的参考方法。赞助:瑞典医学研究委员会(项目B94-19X-04721-19A),瑞典制粉工业,威廉和马丁纳·伦德格伦基金会以及瑞典营养基金会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号