...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical nutrition >Assessment of habitual energy and macronutrient intake in adults: comparison of a seven day food record with a dietary history interview.
【24h】

Assessment of habitual energy and macronutrient intake in adults: comparison of a seven day food record with a dietary history interview.

机译:成人习惯性能量和大量营养素摄入的评估:7天食物记录与饮食史访谈的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To examine the quantitative agreement between a 7 day food record and a diet history interview when these are conducted under the same conditions and to evaluate whether the two methods assess habitual diet intake differently among subgroups of age and body mass index (BMI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Population study, Denmark. SUBJECTS: A total of 175 men and 173 women aged 30-60 y, selected randomly from a larger population sample of Danish adults. INTERVENTIONS: All subjects had habitual diet intake assessed by a diet history interview and completed a 7 day food record within 3 weeks following the interview. The diet history interview and coding of records were performed by the same trained dietician. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Median between-method difference in assessment of total energy intake, absolute intake of macronutrients, and nutrient energy percentages. Difference between reported energy intake from both methods and estimated energy expenditure in different subgroups. RESULTS: Energy and macronutrient intake was assessed slightly higher by the 7 day food record than by the diet history interview, but in absolute terms the differences were negligible. The between-method difference in assessment of total energy intake appeared to be stable over the range of age and BMI in both sexes. As compared to estimated total energy expenditure, both diet assessment methods underestimated energy intake by approximately 20%. For both methods the under-reporting increased by BMI in both sexes and by age in men. CONCLUSIONS: Energy and macronutrient intake data collected under even conditions by either a 7 day food record or a diet history interview may be collapsed and analysed independent of the underlying diet method. Both diet methods, however, appear to underestimate energy intake dependent on age and BMI. SPONSORSHIP: Danish Medical Research Council, the FREJA programme.
机译:目的:研究在相同条件下进行的7天饮食记录和饮食史访谈之间的定量一致性,并评估这两种方法在年龄和体重指数(BMI)的亚组之间对习惯饮食摄入的评估是否不同。设计:横断面研究。地点:丹麦人口研究。研究对象:年龄在30至60岁之间的175名男性和173名女性,是从丹麦成年人口中随机抽取的。干预措施:所有受试者均通过饮食史访谈评估其习惯性饮食摄入量,并在访谈后3周内完成7天的饮食记录。饮食历史访谈和记录编码是由同一位受过训练的营养师进行的。主要观察指标:总能量摄入量,绝对营养素绝对摄入量和营养素能量百分比评估中方法之间的中位数差异。两种方法的报告能量摄入量与不同子组中估计能量消耗之间的差异。结果:7天的饮食记录对能量和大量营养素的摄入进行了评估,略高于饮食史访谈,但从绝对意义上讲,差异可以忽略不计。男女双方在年龄和BMI范围内评估总能量摄入的方法间差异似乎稳定。与估算的总能量消耗相比,两种饮食评估方法均将能量摄入低估了约20%。对于这两种方法,男性和女性的BMI漏报均增加。结论:在7天的食物记录或饮食史采访中,即使在均匀条件下收集的能量和大量营养素摄入数据也可能会崩溃,并且与基本的饮食方法无关地进行分析。然而,两种饮食方法似乎都低估了取决于年龄和BMI的能量摄入。赞助:丹麦医学研究理事会的FREJA计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号