首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: Official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology >The significance of persistent fever in the treatment of suspected bacterial infections among inpatients: a prospective cohort study
【24h】

The significance of persistent fever in the treatment of suspected bacterial infections among inpatients: a prospective cohort study

机译:持续发烧在住院患者可疑细菌感染治疗中的意义:一项前瞻性队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Antibiotic escalations are frequently guided by fever persistence. Unnecessary antibiotic escalation is associated with resistance induction. We examined whether fever persistence is associated with adverse outcomes among medical inpatients with sepsis. In a single-center prospective cohort study, we included consecutive medical inpatients with suspected or documented bacterial infections. Data were collected on days 0, 2, 4, and 30 days from episode onset. We examined the association between fever persistence at 4 days and 30-day mortality on univariate and multivariate analysis. Inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (IAET) was defined for patients with microbiologically documented infections (MDIs). Odds ratios (ORs) are presented with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 1,621 patients were included. Among patients with MDIs, 38/206 (18.4 %) given appropriate empiric therapy had continued fever on day 4, compared to 64/231 (27.7 %) of patients receiving IAET, OR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.37-0.93. Fever persistence was not associated with mortality after adjustment for other risk factors. Among patients with presumed sepsis who did not have MDIs, persistent fever was significantly associated with 30-day mortality on a multivariate analysis, adjusted OR 2.77 (95 % CI 1.78-4.31). Other risk factors for mortality included older age, nosocomial infections, malignancy, dyspnea, shock, decreased albumin, and elevated creatinine. For patients with MDIs, fever persistence for up to 4 days is a marker of IAET, but is not associated with mortality, and should not, in itself, trigger antibiotic escalation. For patients without MDIs, fever persistence should trigger careful re-evaluation, as it is associated with mortality.
机译:抗生素升级经常由持续发烧指导。不必要的抗生素升级与耐药性诱导有关。我们检查了脓毒症住院患者的发热持续性是否与不良后果相关。在单中心前瞻性队列研究中,我们纳入了怀疑或有记录的细菌感染的连续住院患者。从发作开始的第0、2、4和30天收集数据。在单变量和多变量分析中,我们检查了4天发热持续时间与30天死亡率之间的关系。对于具有微生物学记录的感染(MDI)的患者,定义了不适当的经验性抗生素治疗(IAET)。赔率(OR)的置信区间(CIs)为95%。总共包括1,621名患者。在MDI患者中,接受适当经验治疗的38/206(18.4%)在第4天持续发烧,而接受IAET的患者为64/231(27.7%),或0.59,95%CI 0.37-0.93。调整其他危险因素后,发热持续性与死亡率无关。在没有MDI的脓毒症败血症患者中,经多因素分析(调整后的OR为2.77,95%CI为1.78-4.31),持续发烧与30天死亡率显着相关。死亡的其他危险因素包括年龄较大,医院感染,恶性肿瘤,呼吸困难,休克,白蛋白降低和肌酐升高。对于MDI患者,持续4天的发热持续性是IAET的标志,但与死亡率无关,并且其本身不应触发抗生素升级。对于没有MDI的患者,发烧持久性应引发仔细的重新评估,因为这与死亡率有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号