...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of anaesthesiology >Bolus dose remifentanil and sufentanil blunting cardiovascular intubation responses in children: a randomized, double-blind comparison.
【24h】

Bolus dose remifentanil and sufentanil blunting cardiovascular intubation responses in children: a randomized, double-blind comparison.

机译:小儿剂量瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼使儿童的心血管插管反应减弱:一项随机,双盲比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The present randomized controlled study was designed to compare the efficacy of remifentanil 2 microg kg(-1) and sufentanil 0.2 microg kg(-1) by bolus injection on the cardiovascular response to intubation in healthy children. METHODS: One hundred and five children, ASA 1-2 and scheduled for elective plastic surgery under general anaesthesia, were randomly divided into one of two study groups to receive the following treatments in a double-blind manner: remifentanil 2 microg kg(-1) (group R) and sufentanil 0.2 microg kg(-1) (group S). Blood pressure and heart rate (HR) were recorded before anaesthesia induction (baseline values), immediately before intubation (postinduction values), at intubation and every minute for 5 min after intubation. The percentage changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and HR relative to baseline values were calculated. The incidences of SBP and HR percentage changes of more than 30% of baseline values during the observation were recorded. RESULTS: As compared with baseline values, blood pressure and HR at intubation and their maximum values during the observation increased significantly in group S, but decreased significantly in group R. Blood pressure and HR at intubation and their maximum values during the observation were significantly different between the groups. There were significant differences between the groups in the percentage changes of SBP and HR relative to baseline values and their maximum percentage changes during the observation. The incidences of SBP and HR percentage increases of more than 30% of baseline values were not significantly different between the groups, but the incidences of SBP and HR percentage decreases of more than 30% of baseline values were significantly higher in group R than in group S. CONCLUSION: In combination with propofol for anaesthesia induction in children, sufentanil 0.2 microg kg(-1) by bolus injection fails to depress the cardiovascular intubation response. Remifentanil 2 microg kg(-1) by bolus injection can completely abolish the cardiovascular intubation response, but causes more adverse cardiovascular depression.
机译:背景与目的:本随机对照研究旨在比较推注雷米芬太尼2 microg kg(-1)和舒芬太尼0.2 microg kg(-1)对健康儿童插管心血管反应的疗效。方法:将105名ASA 1-2并计划在全身麻醉下进行择期整形手术的儿童随机分为两个研究组之一,以双盲方式接受以下治疗:瑞芬太尼2 microg kg(-1) )(R组)和舒芬太尼0.2 microg kg(-1)(S组)。麻醉前(插管前),插管前,插管时和插管后5分钟每分钟记录一次血压和心率(HR)。计算相对于基线值的收缩压(SBP)和HR的百分比变化。记录观察期间SBP和HR百分比变化的发生率超过基线值的30%。结果:与基线值相比,插管组的血压和HR及其观察期间的最大值在S组中显着增加,但在R组中显着降低。插管组的血压和HR及其在观察期间的最大值存在显着差异组之间。在观察期间,两组之间的SBP和HR相对于基线值的百分比变化及其最大百分比变化存在显着差异。各组之间SBP和HR百分比升高的发生率均超过基线值的30%并没有显着差异,但R组的SBP和HR百分比降低率均超过基线值的发生率显着高于R组。结论:与丙泊酚联合用于小儿麻醉,小剂量注射舒芬太尼0.2 microg kg(-1)不能降低心血管插管反应。推注瑞芬太尼2微克kg(-1)可以完全消除心血管插管反应,但会导致更多的不良心血管抑郁症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号