...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of anaesthesiology >Regional cerebral saturation versus transcranial Doppler during carotid endarterectomy under regional anaesthesia.
【24h】

Regional cerebral saturation versus transcranial Doppler during carotid endarterectomy under regional anaesthesia.

机译:区域麻醉下在颈动脉内膜切除术中区域性脑饱和与经颅多普勒比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare a cerebral oximeter with transcranial Doppler (TCD) as a neurological monitor in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under regional anaesthesia. METHODS: Forty patients were enrolled for this prospective study. We recorded every adverse neurological event after arterial clamping and variations in parameters evaluated by the two monitoring systems in order to determine whether there was any correlation between TCD data and those obtained by regional cerebral saturation, the timing of detection of the adverse event in both clinical examination and instrumental data and the presence of any false positives or negatives in any of the two monitoring systems. RESULTS: Shunting was necessary in eight patients, following clinical signs of a neurological deficit during clamping. In these patients, a significant reduction in TCD values and regional cerebral saturation values from baseline was recorded. We observed a drastic reduction in TCD values in four patients during clamping (6 +/- 5 versus 41 +/- 4 cm s) that was not associated with any neurological deficit or reduction in regional cerebral saturation values (51 +/- 4 versus 54 +/- 7%). Instrumental detection of a neurological deficit anticipated the clinical observation of about 5-10 s. CONCLUSION: We observed a greater reliability with the cerebral oximeter than with TCD in our patients.
机译:背景与目的:本研究的目的是比较区域麻醉下接受颈动脉内膜切除术的患者的脑血氧饱和度计与经颅多普勒(TCD)作为神经系统监测仪的比较。方法:40名患者参加了这项前瞻性研究。我们记录了动脉夹闭后的每一次不良神经系统事件,并通过两个监测系统评估了参数的变化,以确定在TCD数据与通过局部脑饱和度获得的数据之间是否存在任何相关性,以及两种临床中不良事件的检测时间检查和仪器数据,以及两个监控系统中的任何一个是否存在假阳性或阴性。结果:在钳夹期间出现神经功能缺损的临床体征后,八名患者必须进行分流。在这些患者中,TCD值和局部脑饱和度值较基线显着降低。我们观察到四名患者在钳夹期间TCD值急剧下降(6 +/- 5 vs 41 +/- 4 cm s),这与任何神经功能缺损或局部脑饱和度值的降低均无关(51 +/- 4vs。 54 +/- 7%)。仪器检测神经功能缺损预期约5-10 s的临床观察。结论:在我们的患者中,我们发现使用脑血氧仪比使用TCD具有更高的可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号