首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: Official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology >Bowel colonization with resistant gram-negative bacilli after antimicrobial therapy of intra-abdominal infections: observations from two randomized comparative clinical trials of ertapenem therapy.
【24h】

Bowel colonization with resistant gram-negative bacilli after antimicrobial therapy of intra-abdominal infections: observations from two randomized comparative clinical trials of ertapenem therapy.

机译:腹腔内感染抗菌治疗后耐药革兰氏阴性杆菌肠道定植:厄他培南治疗的两项随机比较临床试验观察结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The selection of resistant gram-negative bacilli by broad-spectrum antibiotic use is a major issue in infection control. The aim of this comparative study was to assess the impact of different antimicrobial regimens commonly used to treat intra-abdominal infections on the susceptibility patterns of gram-negative bowel flora after completion of therapy. In two international randomized open-label trials with laboratory blinding, adults with complicated intra-abdominal infection requiring surgery received piperacillin-tazobactam (OASIS 1) or ceftriaxone/metronidazole (OASIS II) versus ertapenem for 4-14 days. Rectal swabs were obtained at baseline, end of therapy, and 2 weeks post-therapy. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. were tested for production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL). Enterobacteriaceae resistant to the agent used were recovered from 19 of 156 (12.2%) piperacillin-tazobactam recipients at the end of therapy compared to 1 (0.6%) patient at baseline (p<0.001) in OASIS I, and from33 of 193 (17.1%) ceftriaxone/metronidazole recipients at the end of therapy compared to 5 (2.6%) patients at baseline (p<0.001) in OASIS II. Ertapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae were recovered from 1 of 155 and 1 of 196 ertapenem recipients at the end of therapy versus 0 and 1 ertapenem recipients at baseline in OASIS I and II, respectively. Resistant Enterobacteriaceae emerged significantly less often during treatment with ertapenem than with the comparator in both OASIS I (p<0.001) and OASIS II (p<0.001). The prevalence of ESBL-producers increased significantly during therapy in OASIS II among 193 ceftriaxone/metronidazole recipients (from 4 [2.1%] to 18 [9.3%]) (p<0.001), whereas no ertapenem recipient was colonized with an ESBL-producer at the end of therapy in either study. Selection for imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa was uncommon in all treatment groups. In these studies, the frequency of bowel colonization with resistant Enterobacteriaceae substantially increased in patients treated with either piperacillin-tazobactam or ceftriaxone/metronidazole, but not in patients treated with ertapenem.
机译:通过广谱抗生素的使用来选择耐药革兰氏阴性菌是控制感染的主要问题。这项比较研究的目的是评估完成治疗后通常用于治疗腹腔内感染的不同抗菌方案对革兰氏阴性肠菌群易感性的影响。在两项具有实验室盲法的国际随机开放标签试验中,需要手术的复杂腹腔内感染成年人接受哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(OASIS 1)或头孢曲松/甲硝唑(OASIS II)与厄他培南治疗4-14天。在基线,治疗结束和治疗后2周获得了直肠拭子。大肠杆菌和克雷伯菌属。测试了广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的产生。在治疗结束时从156名哌拉西林-他唑巴坦接受者中有19名(12.2%)接受了对所用药物耐药的肠杆菌科,而在OASIS I中基线时有1名(0.6%)患者(p <0.001)和193名中的33名(17.1) (%)头孢曲松/甲硝唑接受治疗的患者与OASIS II中基线时的5名患者(2.6%)相比(p <0.001)。在治疗结束时,从155名接受治疗的ertapenem接受者中的1名和196名接受治疗的ertapenem接受者中恢复了对Ertapenem耐药的肠杆菌科,而在OASIS I和II期,基线时分别从0名和1名ertapenem接受者中恢复出来。在OASIS I(p <0.001)和OASIS II中(p <0.001),用厄他培南治疗期间耐药肠杆菌的出现频率均显着低于比较者。在OASIS II中,在193名头孢曲松/甲硝唑接受者的治疗期间,ESBL产生者的患病率显着增加(从4 [2.1%]增至18 [9.3%])(p <0.001),而没有厄他培南接受者被ESBL产生者定殖。在任何一项研究中,治疗结束时在所有治疗组中,对亚胺培南耐药的铜绿假单胞菌的选择并不常见。在这些研究中,用哌拉西林-他唑巴坦或头孢曲松/甲硝唑治疗的患者肠杆菌科肠杆菌耐药菌的定植频率显着增加,但厄他培南治疗的患者则没有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号