...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of applied physiology >Electrostimulation improves muscle perfusion but does not affect either muscle deoxygenation or pulmonary oxygen consumption kinetics during a heavy constant-load exercise.
【24h】

Electrostimulation improves muscle perfusion but does not affect either muscle deoxygenation or pulmonary oxygen consumption kinetics during a heavy constant-load exercise.

机译:在重负荷的恒定负荷运动中,电刺激可改善肌肉灌注,但不影响肌肉脱氧或肺部耗氧动力学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Electromyostimulation (EMS) is commonly used as part of training programs. However, the exact effects at the muscle level are largely unknown and it has been recently hypothesized that the beneficial effect of EMS could be mediated by an improved muscle perfusion. In the present study, we investigated rates of changes in pulmonary oxygen consumption [Formula: see text] and muscle deoxygenation during a standardized exercise performed after an EMS warm-up session. We aimed at determining whether EMS could modify pulmonary O(2) uptake and muscle deoxygenation as a result of improved oxygen delivery. Nine subjects performed a 6-min heavy constant load cycling exercise bout preceded either by an EMS session (EMS) or under control conditions (CONT). [Formula: see text] and heart rate (HR) were measured while deoxy-(HHb), oxy-(HbO(2)) and total haemoglobin/myoglobin (Hb(tot)) relative contents were measured using near infrared spectroscopy. EMS significantly increased (P < 0.05) the Hb(tot) resting level illustrating a residual hyperaemia. The EMS priming exercise did not affect either the HHb time constant (17.7 +/- 14.2 s vs. 13.1 +/- 2.3 s under control conditions) or the [Formula: see text] kinetics (time-constant = 18.2 +/- 5.2 s vs. 15.4 +/- 4.6 s under control conditions). Likewise, the other [Formula: see text] parameters were unchanged. Our results further indicated that EMS warm-up improved muscle perfusion through a residual hyperaemia. However, neither [Formula: see text] nor [HHb] kinetics were modified accordingly. These results suggest that improved O(2) delivery by residual hyperaemia induced by EMS does not accelerate the rate of aerobic metabolism during heavy exercise at least in trained subjects.
机译:肌电刺激(EMS)通常用作培训计划的一部分。然而,在肌肉水平上的确切作用很大程度上是未知的,并且最近已经假设EMS的有益作用可以通过改善的肌肉灌注来介导。在本研究中,我们调查了在EMS热身后进行的标准化锻炼过程中,肺耗氧量[公式:参见文本]和肌肉脱氧的变化率。我们旨在确定EMS是否可以通过改善氧的输送来改变肺部O(2)的摄取和肌肉脱氧。 9名受试者进行了6分钟的重恒负荷循环运动,然后进行了EMS会话(EMS)或在控制条件下(CONT)。 [公式:参见文字]和心率(HR)分别通过近红外光谱法测定脱氧-(HHb),氧-(HbO(2))和总血红蛋白/肌红蛋白(Hb(tot))的相对含量。 EMS显着增加(P <0.05)Hb(tot)静息水平,说明残余充血。 EMS启动练习既不影响HHb时间常数(在对照条件下为17.7 +/- 14.2 s,而在对照条件下为13.1 +/- 2.3 s),也不影响动力学(时间常数= 18.2 +/- 5.2) s对比控制条件下的15.4 +/- 4.6 s)。同样,其他[公式:参见文本]参数保持不变。我们的结果进一步表明,EMS热身通过残余充血改善了肌肉灌注。但是,[分子式:见正文]和[HHb]动力学都没有相应地改变。这些结果表明,至少在训练有素的受试者中,由EMS引起的残余充血引起的O(2)传递改善不会加快有氧运动的速率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号