首页> 外文期刊>European journal of anaesthesiology >Comparison of local anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine sedation and general anaesthesia during septoplasty.
【24h】

Comparison of local anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine sedation and general anaesthesia during septoplasty.

机译:隔膜成形术中使用右美托咪定镇静和全身麻醉进行局部麻醉的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare general anaesthesia and local anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine on the basis of postoperative pain and surgical bleeding after septoplasties. METHOD: Sixty patients with ASA 1 or 2 were divided into the local anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine (LAD) group (n = 30) and the general anaesthesia group (n = 30). Heart rate (HR), SBP and DBP were monitored. The amount of surgical bleeding, duration of surgery and recovery, postoperative pain evaluations [by visual analogue scale (VAS)] and nausea-vomiting were also recorded. Patients' satisfaction with anaesthesia and quality of breathing was questioned 1 week after discharge. RESULTS: HR values were significantly higher in the general anaesthesia group than in the LAD group at the 15th min and at the end of surgery. The SBP value at the 30th min was significantly higher in the LAD group than in the general anaesthesia group. No difference was observed between the groups with respect to the DBP value. Surgical bleeding and the duration of recovery were significantly less in the LAD group. The postoperative VAS scores were significantly higher in the general anaesthesia group than in the LAD group. Postoperative nausea-vomiting was also significantly greater in the general anaesthesia group. Although more patients in the LAD group preferred this anaesthetic procedure to general anaesthesia, the quality of breathing was better in both groups after surgery. CONCLUSION: Septoplasty performed under local anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine sedation resulted in less surgical bleeding, less postoperative pain, a more stable haemodynamic state, less nausea-vomiting, a shorter recovery period and a higher level of anaesthesia satisfaction.
机译:背景与目的:比较基于右美托咪定的全身麻醉和局部麻醉的效果,以术后隔膜手术后的疼痛和手术出血为基础。方法:将60例ASA 1或2的患者分为右美托咪定(LAD)组(30例)和全身麻醉(30例)。监测心率(HR),SBP和DBP。还记录了手术出血量,手术时间和恢复时间,术后疼痛评估(通过视觉模拟量表(VAS))和恶心呕吐。出院1周后询问患者对麻醉的满意度和呼吸质量。结果:在第15分钟和手术结束时,全身麻醉组的HR值明显高于LAD组。 LAD组第30分钟的SBP值显着高于全身麻醉组。两组之间在DBP值方面没有观察到差异。 LAD组的手术出血和恢复时间显着减少。全身麻醉组的术后VAS评分明显高于LAD组。全身麻醉组的术后恶心呕吐也明显增加。尽管LAD组中有更多的患者比全身麻醉更喜欢这种麻醉方法,但是两组术后的呼吸质量均更好。结论:在局部麻醉下使用右美托咪定镇静进行隔膜成形术可减少手术出血,减少术后疼痛,更稳定的血液动力学状态,减少恶心呕吐,缩短恢复期并提高麻醉满意度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号