首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research >Sedation during spinal anaesthesia : A comparison between Dexmedetomidine and midazolam infusion.
【24h】

Sedation during spinal anaesthesia : A comparison between Dexmedetomidine and midazolam infusion.

机译:脊髓麻醉期间的镇静作用:右美托咪定与咪达唑仑输注的比较。

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: To study the effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion and compare it with intravenous midazolam infusion during spinal anaesthesia (S/A) with regards to effect on psychomotor performance, memory and any side effect. Materials Methods: A prospective randomized double blind study was conducted on 60 patients of ASA I to III, scheduled for lower abdominal or lower limb surgery under S/A. All patients were randomly divided into two groups of 30 each; randomization was done by computer generated random numbers. In Group D, dexmedetomidine 1 ?g/kg and In Group M, midazolam 0.04 mg/kg basal infusion for 10 min then S/A was given with hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%). After achieving required level of S/A; position given and then infusion of inj. Dexmedetomidine 0.5g/kg/hr in group D and Inj. Midazolam 0.04mg/kg/hr by infusion started. Both psychomotor and memory test were performed before study drug infusion and after 1 and 4 hour of stoppage of infusion. Results: Thus, in both the groups, psychomotor performance was not significantly changed as compared to baseline at 1 hour and 4 hour after stoppage of infusion. There was significantly decreased in recall of picture, after 1 hour of study drug infusion in both the groups (anterograde amnesia); which was regained at 1 hour after stoppage of infusion. The mean time required to achieved sedation score (RSS) of 3 were statistically significant shorter in group D as compared to in group M (P < 0.05). At the end of surgery, after stoppage of infusion of study drug, patients of group D achieved RSS score of 2 and that of group M which was comparable (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Thus, we conclude that, Dexmedetomidine provide rapid onset of arousable sedation without causing respiratory and cardiovascular depression. It provides anterograde amnesia with rapid recovery of psychomotor function.
机译:目的:研究右美托咪定静脉滴注的效果,并将其与脊髓麻醉(S / A)期间的咪达唑仑静脉滴注对精神运动表现,记忆力和任何副作用的影响进行比较。材料方法:对60例ASA I至III的ASA I至III患者进行了一项前瞻性随机双盲研究,该患者计划在S / A下进行下腹部或下肢手术。将所有患者随机分为两组,每组30名。随机化是通过计算机生成的随机数完成的。在D组中,右美托咪定1 µg / kg,在M组中,咪达唑仑0.04 mg / kg基础输注10分钟,然后给与S / A高压布比卡因(0.5%)。在达到所需的S / A水平之后;给定位置,然后注入注射液。 D组和注射组右美托咪定0.5g / kg / hr。开始通过输注咪达唑仑0.04mg / kg / hr。在研究药物输注之前以及停止输注1和4小时后,进行了精神运动和记忆力测试。结果:因此,在输注停止后1小时和4小时,两组的精神运动能力与基线相比均无明显变化。在两组中研究药物输注1小时后,图像的回忆显着降低(顺行性健忘症)。输注停止后1小时恢复。与M组相比,D组达到3分镇静分数(RSS)所需的平均时间在统计学上显着缩短(P <0.05)。手术结束时,停止输注研究药物后,D组患者的RSS评分为2分,而M组患者的RSS评分相当(p> 0.05)。结论:因此,我们得出的结论是,右美托咪定可快速起效引起镇静作用,而不会引起呼吸和心血管抑制。它可以使顺行性失忆症的精神运动功能快速恢复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号