首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging >No survival difference after successful (131)I ablation between patients with initially low-risk and high-risk differentiated thyroid cancer.
【24h】

No survival difference after successful (131)I ablation between patients with initially low-risk and high-risk differentiated thyroid cancer.

机译:最初具有低风险和高风险的分化型甲状腺癌患者成功(131)I消融后无生存差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare disease-specific survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after successful (131)I ablation in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) between those defined before ablation as low-risk and those defined as high-risk according to the European Thyroid Association 2006 consensus statement. METHODS: Retrospective data from three university hospitals were pooled. Of 2009 consecutive patients receiving ablation, 509 were identified as successfully ablated based on both undetectable stimulated serum thyroglobulin in the absence of antithyroglobulin antibodies and a negative diagnostic whole-body scan in a follow-up examination conducted 8.1+/-4.6 months after ablation. Of these 509 patients, 169 were defined as high-risk. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 81+/-64 months (range 4-306 months), only three patients had died of DTC, rendering assessment of disease-specific survival differences impossible. Of the 509 patients, 12 (2.4%) developed a recurrence a mean 35 months (range 12-59 months) after ablation. RFS for the duration of follow-up was 96.6% according to the Kaplan-Meier method. RFS did not differ between high-risk and low-risk patients (p=0.68). RFS differed slightly but significantly between those with papillary and those with follicular thyroid carcinoma (p=0.03) and between those aged 45 years at diagnosis (p=0.018). CONCLUSION: After (near) total thyroidectomy and successful (131)I ablation, RFS does not differ between patients classified as high-risk and those classified as low-risk based on TNM stage at diagnosis. Consequently, the follow-up protocol should be determined on the basis of the result of initial treatment rather than on the initial tumour classification.
机译:目的:比较根据消融前定义为低风险和高风险的分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者成功(131)I消融后的疾病特异性生存率和无复发生存率(RFS),根据欧洲甲状腺协会2006年共识声明。方法:收集来自三所大学医院的回顾性数据。在2009年连续接受消融的患者中,有509例被消融是基于无抗甲状腺球蛋白抗体的情况下无法检测到的刺激性甲状腺球蛋白和消融后8.1 +/- 4.6个月进行的全身性阴性诊断。在这509名患者中,有169名被定义为高危患者。结果:在平均随访81 +/- 64个月(范围4-306个月)后,只有3例患者死于DTC,因此无法评估疾病特异性生存差异。在509名患者中,有12名(2.4%)在消融后平均35个月(12-59个月)复发。根据Kaplan-Meier方法,随访期间的RFS为96.6%。高危和低危患者的RFS并无差异(p = 0.68)。乳头状癌和滤泡性甲状腺癌的RFS略有差异,但有显着性差异(p = 0.03),诊断为≥45岁的年龄≥45岁的人间RFS差异(p = 0.018)。结论:在(几乎)全甲状腺切除术和成功的(131)I消融后,根据诊断时的TNM分期,高危患者和低危患者的RFS并无差异。因此,应根据初始治疗的结果而不是最初的肿瘤分类来确定随访方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号