...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of anaesthesiology >Comparison of the analgesic efficacy and plasma concentrations of high-dose intra-articular and intramuscular morphine for knee arthroscopy.
【24h】

Comparison of the analgesic efficacy and plasma concentrations of high-dose intra-articular and intramuscular morphine for knee arthroscopy.

机译:大剂量关节内和肌内吗啡镇痛的镇痛效果和血浆浓度比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It is important to provide good postoperative analgesia after discharge from day case surgery. The usefulness of intra-articular morphine for analgesia after day case knee arthroscopy remains controversial. A large dose of morphine intra-articularly may provide a good long-lasting analgesia, but its efficacy and pharmacokinetics are not known and may be no better than intramuscular morphine. We compared the effect of 10 mg intra-articular and intramuscular morphine for 24 h post-injection in a randomized double-blind study. METHODS: Forty adults undergoing knee arthroscopy were recruited and received either 10mg morphine intra-articularly or intramuscularly. Our primary outcome was overall visual analogue assessment of pain (0-100 mm scale where 0 is no pain and 100 is worst possible pain) between 4 h (on discharge) and 24 h (post-operatively). Plasma morphine concentrations were measured at 15 min, and 1, 2, 4 and 24 h. The use of additional analgesia was noted. RESULTS: The assessment of pain experienced between discharge (4 h) and 24 h was significantly better in the intra-articular (n = 20; mean+/-SD: 18+/-19) than the intramuscular (n = 19; mean+/-SD: 34+/-20) group (P = 0.027). The number of patients consuming any additional analgesia between discharge and 24 h was significantly lower in the intra-articular morphine group (P = 0.038), with 4 (20%) patients in the intra-articular group and 11 (60%) patients in the intramuscular group consuming supplementary analgesia. There were no differences in plasma morphine concentrations between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: A large dose of intra-articular morphine provided better analgesia than the same dose of intramuscular morphine, low plasma morphine levels suggesting a peripheral mechanism.
机译:背景与目的:日间手术出院后提供良好的术后镇痛很重要。膝关节镜检查日间术后关节内使用吗啡的镇痛作用尚存争议。关节内大剂量吗啡可提供良好的持久镇痛作用,但其功效和药代动力学尚不清楚,可能不比肌内吗啡好。在一项随机双盲研究中,我们比较了10 mg关节内和肌内吗啡对注射后24 h的作用。方法:招募了四十名接受膝关节镜检查的成年人,他们在关节内或肌内接受了10mg吗啡。我们的主要结果是在出院后4小时至手术后24小时之间对疼痛进行整体视觉模拟评估(0-100 mm评分,其中0为无疼痛,而100为最严重的疼痛)。在15分钟,1、2、4和24小时时测量血浆吗啡浓度。注意到使用了其他镇痛剂。结果:出院(4 h)至24 h之间的疼痛评估在关节内(n = 20;平均值+/- SD:18 +/- 19)比肌肉内(n = 19;平均值+/- -SD:34 +/- 20)组(P = 0.027)。关节内吗啡组在出院至24 h之间使用任何其他镇痛剂的患者数量明显减少(P = 0.038),关节内组中有4(20%)例患者和11(60%)例中。肌肉注射补充镇痛药。两组之间血浆吗啡浓度无差异。结论:大剂量关节内吗啡比相同剂量的肌内吗啡具有更好的镇痛作用,血浆吗啡水平低提示其外周机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号