首页> 外文期刊>European Heart Journal: The Journal of the European Society of Cardiology >Edoxaban vs. warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation on amiodarone: A subgroup analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial
【24h】

Edoxaban vs. warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation on amiodarone: A subgroup analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial

机译:胺碘酮治疗心房颤动的患者使用依多沙班vs华法林:ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48试验的亚组分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, the higher-dose edoxaban (HDE) regimen had a similar incidence of ischaemic stroke compared with warfarin, whereas a higher incidence was observed with the lower-dose regimen (LDE). Amiodarone increases edoxaban plasma levels via P-glycoprotein inhibition. The current pre-specified exploratory analysis was performed to determine the effect of amiodarone on the relative efficacy and safety profile of edoxaban. Methods and results At randomization, 2492 patients (11.8%) were receiving amiodarone. The primary efficacy endpoint of stroke or systemic embolic event was significantly lower with LDE compared with warfarin in amiodarone treated patients vs. patients not on amiodarone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 0.36-0.99 and HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.40, respectively; P interaction <0.01). In patients randomized to HDE, no such interaction for efficacy was observed (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.46-1.17 vs. HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.05, P interaction = 0.446). Major bleeding was similar in patients on LDE (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.21-0.59 vs. HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.46-0.61, P interaction = 0.131) and HDE (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.65-1.38 vs. HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90, P interaction = 0.392) when compared with warfarin, independent of amiodarone use. Conclusions Patients randomized to the LDE treated with amiodarone at the time of randomization demonstrated a significant reduction in ischaemic events vs. warfarin when compared with those not on amiodarone, while preserving a favourable bleeding profile. In contrast, amiodarone had no effect on the relative efficacy and safety of HDE.
机译:背景在ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48试验中,与华法林相比,高剂量的edoxaban(HDE)方案与缺血性卒中的发生率相似,而低剂量的方案(LDE)则观察到较高的发病率。胺碘酮可通过P糖蛋白抑制作用来增加edoxaban血浆水平。目前进行了预先指定的探索性分析,以确定胺碘酮对依多沙班的相对疗效和安全性的影响。方法和结果在随机分组中,有2492例患者(11.8%)接受胺碘酮治疗。与胺碘酮治疗组和非胺碘酮治疗组相比,LDE的中风或全身栓塞事件的主要疗效终点显着低于华法林(危险比[HR] 0.60、95%置信区间[CIs] 0.36-0.99和HR 1.20, 95%CI分别为1.03-1.40; P相互作用<0.01)。在随机分配给HDE的患者中,未观察到这种功效交互作用(HR 0.73,95%CI 0.46-1.17与HR 0.89,95%CI 0.75-1.05,P交互作用= 0.446)。 LDE(HR 0.35,95%CI 0.21-0.59 vs. HR 0.53,95%CI 0.46-0.61,P相互作用= 0.131)和HDE(HR 0.94,95%CI 0.65-1.38 vs.HR)的患者大出血相似与华法林相比,独立于胺碘酮的使用率为0.79,95%CI为0.69-0.90,P相互作用= 0.392)。结论随机分组接受胺碘酮治疗的LDE患者与未使用胺碘酮的患者相比,与华法林相比,缺血事件显着减少,同时保持了良好的出血特征。相反,胺碘酮对HDE的相对疗效和安全性没有影响。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号