...
首页> 外文期刊>European Heart Journal: The Journal of the European Society of Cardiology >Seeking new heights in acute heart failure syndromes: Lessons from ASCEND and EVEREST
【24h】

Seeking new heights in acute heart failure syndromes: Lessons from ASCEND and EVEREST

机译:在急性心力衰竭综合征中寻求新的高度:ASCEND和EVEREST的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Safely improving signs and symptoms of heart failure is a major goal in the early management of patients with acute heart failure syndromes (AHFS). The use of available pharmacological agents for the acute management of patients hospitalized with heart failure is largely empirical and has not changed substantially for the last two decades. Over the past two decades, the standard for regulatory approvability for AHFS drugs, however, has radically changed-from haemodynamic benefits alone to demonstration of clinical efficacy and longer term safety. Based on available data, none of the currently employed agents would meet today's standards for approval based on evidence for clinical efficacy and safety. Within clinical practice guidelines, there are no therapeutic Class I, level-of-evidence A guideline recommendations for AHFS. Furthermore, the majority of AHFS trials conducted in the last decade has been negative, in terms of efficacy and/or safety. Results from the Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure Outcome Study With Tolvaptan (EVEREST) and the Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompen-sated Heart Failure Trial (ASCEND-HF), two of the largest trials conducted to date, provide reason for re-examining our approach to clinical investigation and regulatory decision-making in this condition.
机译:安全改善心力衰竭的体征和症状是早期治疗急性心力衰竭综合征(AHFS)患者的主要目标。对心力衰竭住院患者的急性治疗使用现有的药理学方法在很大程度上是凭经验的,并且在过去的二十年中并没有实质性的改变。在过去的二十年中,AHFS药物的监管批准标准已经发生了根本性的变化-从单纯的血液动力学益处到临床疗效和长期安全性的证明。根据现有数据,基于临床疗效和安全性的证据,目前使用的药物均未达到当今批准的标准。在临床实践指南中,没有针对AHFS的治疗性I类证据级别A指南建议。此外,在功效和/或安全性方面,过去十年来进行的大多数AHFS试验都是阴性的。加压素拮抗作用在托伐普坦的心衰结果研究中的效果(EVEREST)和奈西立肽在独立的心衰试验中的临床有效性的急性研究(ASCEND-HF)是迄今为止进行的两项最大的试验,结果提供了理由。在这种情况下重新审查我们的临床研究和监管决策方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号