首页> 外文期刊>Environmental & Engineering Geoscience >2011 AEG Outstanding Student Professional Paper
【24h】

2011 AEG Outstanding Student Professional Paper

机译:2011年AEG优秀学生专业论文

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Colluvium and debris-flow deposits differ from each other and from glacial till and glacial outwash deposits in Durango, CO, in terms of sedimentological proper ties evaluated using laboratory testing. Testing included grain-size analysis, Atterberg limits, specific gravity, visual angularity, and uncompacted void content (UVC). Grain-size analysis showed that colluvium, glacial deposits, and debris-flow deposits had different grain-size distributions (GSDs) that occupied fields on a GSD graph with some overlap. Debris-flow deposits had the most gravel-sized grains, and colluvium had the most silt- and clay-sized grains, while glacial till and glacial outwash had very similar GSDs between colluvium and debris-flow deposits. Comparisons of angularity to gravel-to-fines (G/F) ratio provided a second graphical method for discriminating betweendebris-flow, colluvium, and glacial deposits. Generally, colluvium and debris-flow deposits were more angular than glacial till and outwash. Additionally, several linear correlations were recognized between lithology of grains and sedimentological and geotechnical proper ties, the most significant of which were: (1) The angularity of gravel in glacial till and outwash was positively correlated to sandstone gravel content, (2) the plasticity index of outwash fines was positively correlated to the metamorphic gravel content, (3) the amount of outwash fines was positively correlated to sandstone and metamorphic gravel content, while it was negatively correlated to carbonate gravel content, and (4) rounded and sub-rounded gravel content in outwash was positively correlated to carbonate and extrusive igneous gravel content. This study provides insight into the geomechanical differences between depositional mechanisms in similar semiarid environments.
机译:就使用实验室测试评估的沉积学性质而言,科罗拉多州杜兰戈的河床沉积物和泥石流沉积物以及冰盖和冰川冲刷沉积物彼此不同。测试包括粒度分析,Atterberg限值,比重,可视角度和未压实的空隙率(UVC)。粒度分析表明,崩积,冰川沉积物和泥石流沉积物具有不同的粒度分布(GSD),这些分布占据了GSD图上的田地,并且有些重叠。泥石流沉积物具有最大的砾石大小,而崩积层具有最多的粉砂和粘土大小的颗粒,而冰川分till和冰川冲刷物在砂砾岩和泥石流沉积物之间具有非常相似的GSD。角度与砾石/细粉(G / F)比值的比较提供了第二种图解方法来区分泥石流,崩积和冰川沉积物。通常,崩积和泥石流沉积物比冰川耕作和冲刷物更具棱角。此外,在晶粒岩性与沉积学和岩土属性之间还发现了几种线性相关性,其中最重要的是:(1)冰盖和冲刷物中砾石的角度与砂岩砾石含量成正相关,(2)可塑性冲刷细粉指数与变质砾石含量呈正相关;(3)冲刷细粉量与砂岩和变质砾石含量呈正相关,而与碳酸盐砾石含量呈负相关;(4)四舍五入冲积物中砾石含量与碳酸盐和挤压性火成岩砾石含量呈正相关。这项研究提供了对相似半干旱环境中沉积机理之间地质力学差异的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号