...
首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >Capsule endoscopy in acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: A prospective cohort study
【24h】

Capsule endoscopy in acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: A prospective cohort study

机译:胶囊内镜在急性上消化道出血中的一项前瞻性队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and study aims: Capsule endoscopy may play a role in the evaluation of patients presenting with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the emergency department. Patients and methods: We evaluated adults with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage presenting to the emergency departments of two academic centers. Patients ingested a wireless video capsule, which was followed immediately by a nasogastric tube aspiration and later by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). We compared capsule endoscopy with nasogastric tube aspiration for determination of the presence of blood, and with EGD for discrimination of the source of bleeding, identification of peptic/inflammatory lesions, safety, and patient satisfaction. Results: The study enrolled 49 patients (32 men, 17 women; mean age 58.3??19 years), but three patients did not complete the capsule endoscopy and five were intolerant of the nasogastric tube. Blood was detected in the upper gastrointestinal tract significantly more often by capsule endoscopy (15/18 [83.3%]) than by nasogastric tube aspiration (6/18 [33.3%]; P=0.035). There was no significant difference in the identification of peptic/inflammatory lesions between capsule endoscopy (27/40 [67.5%]) and EGD (35/40 [87.5%]; P=0.10, OR 0.39 95%CI 0.11-1.15). Capsule endoscopy reached the duodenum in 45/46 patients (98%). One patient (2.2%) had self-limited shortness of breath and one (2.2%) had coughing on capsule ingestion. Conclusions: In an emergency department setting, capsule endoscopy appears feasible and safe in people presenting with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Capsule endoscopy identifies gross blood in the upper gastrointestinal tract, including the duodenum, significantly more often than nasogastric tube aspiration and identifies inflammatory lesions, as well as EGD. Capsule endoscopy may facilitate patient triage and earlier endoscopy, but should not be considered a substitute for EGD. ? Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart ?? New York.
机译:背景与研究目的:胶囊内镜可能在急诊科对急性上消化道出血患者的评估中发挥作用。患者和方法:我们评估了出现在两个学术中心急诊科的急性上消化道出血的成年人。患者摄入了一个无线视频胶囊,随后立即进行了鼻胃管抽吸术,随后进行了食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)。我们将胶囊内窥镜检查与鼻胃管穿刺术比较以确定是否存在血液,并与EGD进行比较以区分出血源,鉴定消化性/炎性病变,安全性和患者满意度。结果:该研究招募了49例患者(男32例,女17例;平均年龄58.3±19岁),但三例患者未完成胶囊内镜检查,其中五例不耐受鼻胃管。胶囊内窥镜检查(15/18 [83.3%])比上鼻胃管抽吸术(6/18 [33.3%]; P = 0.035)更频繁地在上消化道中检测到血液。胶囊内窥镜检查(27/40 [67.5%])和EGD(35/40 [87.5%]; P = 0.10,或0.39 95%CI 0.11-1.15)之间对消化性/炎性病变的鉴定没有显着差异。胶囊内窥镜检查在45/46例患者中达到了十二指肠(98%)。一名患者(2.2%)出现自限性呼吸急促,一名患者(2.2%)服用胶囊后咳嗽。结论:在急诊室中,胶囊内窥镜检查对于出现急性上消化道出血的人似乎是可行和安全的。胶囊内窥镜检查法比鼻胃管抽吸法更能识别包括十二指肠在内的上消化道总血量,并能识别出炎症性病变以及EGD。胶囊内窥镜检查可能有助于患者分诊和早期内窥镜检查,但不应视为EGD的替代品。 ? Georg Thieme Verlag KG斯图加特??纽约。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号