首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >Endoscopic biliary drainage by nasobiliary drain or by stent placement in patients with acute cholangitis.
【24h】

Endoscopic biliary drainage by nasobiliary drain or by stent placement in patients with acute cholangitis.

机译:急性胆管炎患者通过鼻胆管引流或通过支架置入进行内镜胆汁引流。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic biliary drainage is an established mode of treatment for acute cholangitis. We compared the safety and efficacy of nasobiliary drain (NBD) placement and stent placement for biliary drainage in patients with acute cholangitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited a total of 150 patients with severe cholangitis who required endoscopic biliary drainage. Patients were randomized to have either a 7-Fr NBD or a 7-Fr straight flap stent placed during endoscopy. Outcome measures included complications related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and the clinical outcome. RESULTS: Of the 150 patients, 75 were randomized to the NBD group and 75 to the stent group. The most common causes of biliary obstruction were common bile duct stones (n = 102) and biliopancreatic malignancies (n = 37). The site of the biliary obstruction was predominantly found to be the lower part of common bile duct in both the NBD group (n = 58) and the stent group (n = 59). Indications for biliary drainage were: a fever of > 100.4 degrees F (n = 140), hypotension (n = 23), peritonism (n = 40), impaired consciousness (n = 29), and failure to improve with conservative management (n = 45). Biliary drainage was achieved in 147 patients. Abdominal pain, fever, jaundice, hypotension, peritonism and altered sensorium improved after a median period of 2 days in both groups. Leukocyte counts became normal after a median time of 7 days in the NBD group and 6 days in the stent group. There were no ERCP-related complications. There were no instances of displacement or kinking of an NBD, occlusion of an NBD or stent, or of stent migration. Four patients died (two in the NBD group and two in the stent group) as a result of uncontrolled cholangitis after 1, 2, 4, and 6 days of biliary drainage. The success rates of biliary drainage in cholangitis were not affected by the type of endoprosthesis used (72/74 for NBD patients vs. 71/73 for stent patients), the etiology of the biliary obstruction (110/112 for benign obstruction vs. 33/35 for malignant obstruction), or the site of the biliary obstruction (28/30 for upper common bile duct obstruction vs. 115/117 for obstruction at the lower end of common bile duct). CONCLUSIONS: Biliary drainage by nasobiliary drain and drainage by stent are equally safe and effective treatments for patients with severe cholangitis.
机译:背景与研究目的:内镜胆道引流术是一种治疗急性胆管炎的既定模式。我们比较了鼻胆管引流(NBD)和支架置入术对急性胆管炎患者的胆道引流的安全性和有效性。患者与方法:我们共招募了150例需要内镜下胆道引流的重度胆管炎患者。患者被随机分配在内镜检查期间放置7-Fr NBD或7-Fr直瓣支架。结果措施包括与内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)有关的并发症和临床结局。结果:在150例患者中,将75例随机分配到NBD组,将75例随机分配到支架组。胆道梗阻的最常见原因是胆总管结石(102例)和胆胰恶性肿瘤(37例)。在NBD组(n = 58)和支架组(n = 59)中,胆道梗阻的部位主要位于胆总管下部。胆道引流的指征为:发烧> 100.4华氏度(n = 140),低血压(n = 23),腹膜炎(n = 40),意识障碍(n = 29)和保守治疗未能改善(n = 45)。 147例患者实现了胆道引流。两组中位数为2天后,腹部疼痛,发烧,黄疸,低血压,腹膜紧张和感觉觉改变均得到改善。 NBD组中位数为7天,支架组中位数为6天后,白细胞计数恢复正常。没有ERCP相关的并发症。没有发生NBD移位或扭结,NBD或支架闭塞或支架迁移的情况。胆管引流1、2、4和6天后,由于不受控制的胆管炎,有4例患者死亡(NBD组2例,支架组2例)。胆管炎的胆管引流成功率不受所用假体类型的影响(NBD患者为72/74,支架患者为71/73),胆道梗阻的病因(良性梗阻为110/112 vs. 33) / 35(对于恶性梗阻)或胆道梗阻部位(上胆总管梗阻为28/30,胆总管下端梗阻为115/117)。结论:鼻胆管引流和支架置管引流对于重度胆管炎患者是同样安全有效的治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号