...
首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >Synergistic sedation with low-dose midazolam and propofol for colonoscopies (see comments)
【24h】

Synergistic sedation with low-dose midazolam and propofol for colonoscopies (see comments)

机译:与小剂量咪达唑仑和丙泊酚协同镇静用于结肠镜检查(见评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Patients undergoing colonoscopy are often sedated with benzodiazepines and long-acting opiates. Since low-dose midazolam also acts synergistically with short-acting propofol, we compared this synergistic sedation with a standard combination of midazolam and the opioid nalbuphine for colonoscopies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 79 patients presenting for colonoscopies were randomly assigned to the following protocols. Patients in group I (n = 32) received a median dose of 9 mg midazolam (interquartile range [IQR] 6 to 12); 20 patients (59%) needed additional nalbuphine (median 20 mg, IQR 10 to 20). Patients in group II (n = 47) received 2 mg midazolam and repeated injections of propofol (median 100 mg, IQR 53 to 145) with a maximal bolus of 50 mg. RESULTS: Patients treated with the synergistic sedation (group II) recovered remarkably sooner after the procedure compared with those in group I, with a median time to discharge of 17 minutes vs. 93 minutes (P<0.001). Of the patients treated with analgosedation (group I), 28 % were unable to take part in a reaction time measurement and attention awareness test 1 hour after the procedure. All patients treated with the synergistic sedation were able to participate (P=0.002), and performed better. Despite a lower proportion of complete amnesia, patients treated with synergistic sedation more often rated the procedure as comfortable (81% vs. 50 %). Quality of sedation from the point of view of the endoscopist, and cardiorespiratory parameters, were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose midazolam combined with propofol is an effective and economic alternative to benzodiazepine-based analgosedation. It is associated with a high degree of patient comfort and rapid recovery times, and has a potential cost benefit concerning nursing care and bed facilities.
机译:背景和研究目的:接受结肠镜检查的患者通常使用苯二氮卓类和长效阿片类药物镇静。由于小剂量咪达唑仑与短效丙泊酚也具有协同作用,因此我们将这种镇静作用与咪达唑仑和阿片类纳布啡的标准组合用于结肠镜检查进行了比较。患者与方法:共有79例结肠镜检查患者被随机分配至以下方案。第一组(n = 32)的患者接受的中位剂量为9 mg咪达唑仑(四分位间距[IQR] 6至12); 20名患者(59%)需要额外的纳布啡(中值20 mg,IQR 10至20)。 II组患者(n = 47)接受2 mg咪达唑仑,并反复注射异丙酚(中位数100 mg,IQR 53至145),最大推注剂量为50 mg。结果:与第一组相比,接受协同镇静剂治疗的患者(第二组)术后恢复得更快,平均出院时间为17分钟比93分钟(P <0.001)。在进行了镇静治疗的患者(I组)中,有28%的患者在术后1小时无法参加反应时间测量和注意力意识测试。所有接受了镇静作用的患者均能够参与(P = 0.002),并且表现更好。尽管完全性健忘症的比例较低,但接受协同镇静剂治疗的患者对手术的满意度更高(81%比50%)。从内镜医师的角度来看,镇静的质量和心肺参数均相似。结论:小剂量咪达唑仑与丙泊酚联合使用是一种有效且经济的替代苯二氮卓类麻醉剂的方法。它具有高度的患者舒适度和快速的恢复时间,并且在护理和床具方面具有潜在的成本优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号