首页> 外文期刊>Educational and Psychological Measurement >Impact of Missing Data on the Detection of Differential Item Functioning The Case of Mantel-Haenszel and Logistic Regression Analysis
【24h】

Impact of Missing Data on the Detection of Differential Item Functioning The Case of Mantel-Haenszel and Logistic Regression Analysis

机译:缺失数据对差异项功能检测的影响Mantel-Haenszel案和Logistic回归分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article describes the results of a simulation study to investigate the impact of missing data on the detection of differential item functioning (DIF). Specifically, it investigates how four methods for dealing with missing data (listwise deletion, zero imputation, two-way imputation, response function imputation) interact with two methods of DIF detection (Mantel-Haenszel statistic, logistic regression analysis) under three mechanisms of missingness (data missing completely at random, data missing at random, and data missing not at random) to produce over-or underestimates of the DIF effect sizes and detection rates. Results show that the interaction effects between missingness mechanism, treatment, and rate are most influential for explaining variation in bias, root mean square errors, and rejection rates. An incorrect treatment of missing data can thus lead to severe increases of Type I and Type II error rates. However, the choice between the two DIF detection methods investigated in this study is not important.
机译:本文介绍了模拟研究的结果,以调查缺失数据对差异项目功能(DIF)检测的影响。具体而言,它研究了三种缺失机制下处理四种缺失数据的方法(按列表删除,零归因,双向归因,响应函数归因)与两种DIF检测方法(Mantel-Haenszel统计,对数回归分析)如何相互作用。 (数据完全随机丢失,数据随机丢失以及数据随机丢失)会导致DIF效果大小和检测率过高或过低。结果表明,缺失机制,治疗和比率之间的相互作用对解释偏差,均方根误差和拒绝率的变化影响最大。因此,对丢失数据的不正确处理会导致I型和II型错误率的严重增加。但是,在本研究中研究的两种DIF检测方法之间的选择并不重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号