...
首页> 外文期刊>East Asian science, technology and society: an international journal >From Politics to Academics: Political Activism and the Emergence of Science and Technology Studies in South Korea
【24h】

From Politics to Academics: Political Activism and the Emergence of Science and Technology Studies in South Korea

机译:从政治到学术:政治行动主义与韩国科学技术的兴起

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Science and technology studies (STS) is now a mature field in many countries, and it is important to understand its historical and political roots in awide variety of national contexts. The present contribution to such a vast project links a number of South Korean activist groups involved in a critical reflection upon science and technology in the 1970s and the 1980s to the academic developments of the STS field in the 1990s. A focus on the activist roots of South Korea’s STS counterbalances more institutional and less politicized histories of the field; it also enlightens the specificity of critical approaches to science in the context of an emerging power that was a military dictatorship. The authors describe how a group of students and professors, most of whom had been trained as scientists and engineers, created a discussion circle to foster a critical and political discourse on science. They then trace the emergence of the new field through the dissemination of texts and their reception. The academic aspects of Korean STS are then compared, over three periods, with similar currents in Europe and the United States. The conclusion shows that the critique of science that emerged in South Korea took a form substantially different from critiques elsewhere, linking this difference to political and institutional causes.
机译:科学技术研究(STS)现在在许多国家已经是一个成熟的领域,重要的是要了解其在各种国家背景下的历史和政治根源。目前对如此庞大的项目所做的贡献将参与批判性思考1970年代和1980年代科学技术的许多韩国激进主义者团体与1990年代STS领域的学术发展联系在一起。专注于韩国STS的激进主义者根源可以抵消该领域更多的机构化和政治化的历史;在作为军事独裁的新兴大国的背景下,它也启发了批判性科学方法的特殊性。作者描述了一群学生和教授(其中大多数人都经过了科学家和工程师的培训)如何建立一个讨论圈,以促进对科学的批判性和政治性论述。然后,他们通过文本的传播和接受来追踪新领域的出现。然后,在三个时期内,将韩国STS的学术方面与欧洲和美国的类似情况进行比较。结论表明,韩国出现的对科学的批判与其他地方的批判有着本质上不同的形式,将这种差异与政治和制度原因联系在一起。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号