【24h】

Medical expertise, bodies, and the law in early modern courts

机译:早期现代法院中的医学专业知识,机构和法律

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Going beyond Enlightenment critiques of ancien regime justice, historians are now exploring its distinctive procedures; courtrooms have become a fundamental site for recapturing early modern political and social dynamics. Historians of science and medicine can benefit too. Serving as expert witnesses was prominent among the activities of medical practitioners; and, especially in Continental Europe, natural and medical knowledge was routinely presented and contested in tribunals. This essay aims to promote further research on the resulting wealth of manuscript and printed sources that give access to crucial social and epistemological issues. The voices of different actors, preserved in trial records, can extend our histories of the body. The relations among medical practitioners, and with the legal authorities, provide a hitherto neglected context within which to understand contemporary epistemological debates, from claims and challenges to expertise to the definition and production of evidence, including the status of signs, personal observation, and tests.
机译:历史学家们已经超越了启蒙运动对古代政权正义的批评,现在正在探索其独特的程序。法庭已成为重新捕捉早期现代政治和社会动力的基本场所。科学和医学的历史学家也可以从中受益。在医生的活动中,担任专家证人很重要。而且,尤其是在欧洲大陆,自然和医学知识经常在法庭上陈述和辩论。本文旨在促进对由此产生的大量手稿和印刷资料的来源进行进一步的研究,从而使人们能够获取重要的社会和认识论问题。在审判记录中保留的不同演员的声音可以扩展我们的身体历史。从业人员与法律机构之间的关系提供了迄今为止被忽视的背景,可以理解当代的认识论辩论,从主张和挑战到专业知识,再到证据的定义和产生,包括迹象,个人观察和测试的状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号