...
首页> 外文期刊>Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research >Visual drainage assessment: A standardised visual soil assessment method for use in land drainage design in Ireland
【24h】

Visual drainage assessment: A standardised visual soil assessment method for use in land drainage design in Ireland

机译:视觉排水评估:爱尔兰土地排水设计中使用的标准化视觉土壤评估方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The implementation of site-specific land drainage system designs is usually disregarded by landowners in favour of locally established 'standard practice' land drainage designs. This is due to a number of factors such as a limited understanding of soil-water interactions, lack of facilities for the measurement of soil's physical or hydrological parameters and perceived time wastage and high costs. Hence there is a need for a site-specific drainage system design methodology that does not rely on inaccessible, time-consuming and/or expensive measurements of soil physical or hydrological properties. This requires a standardised process for deciphering the drainage characteristics of a given soil in the field. As an initial step, a new visual soil assessment method, referred to as visual drainage assessment (VDA), is presented whereby an approximation of the permeability of specific soil horizons is made using seven indicators (water seepage, pan layers, texture, porosity, consistence, stone content and root development) to provide a basis for the design of a site-specific drainage system. Across six poorly drained sites (1.3 ha to 2.6 ha in size) in south-west Ireland a VDA-based design was compared with (i) an ideal design (utilising soil physical measurements to elucidate soil hydraulic parameters) and (ii) a standard design (0.8 m deep drains at a 15 m spacing) by model estimate of water table control and rainfall recharge/drain discharge capacity. The VDA method, unlike standard design equivalents, provided a good approximation of an ideal (from measured hydrological properties) design and prescribed an equivalent land drainage system in the field. Mean modelled rainfall recharge/drain discharge capacity for the VDA (13.3 mm/day) and ideal (12.0 mm/day) designs were significantly higher (P < 0.001, s.e. 1.42 mm/day) than for the standard designs (0.5 mm/day), when assuming a design minimum water table depth of 0.45 m.
机译:土地所有者通常不理会特定地点的土地排水系统设计的实施,而赞成当地建立的“标准做法”土地排水设计。这是由于许多因素造成的,例如对土壤与水之间的相互作用的了解有限,缺乏用于测量土壤物理或水文参数的设施以及感知的时间浪费和高成本。因此,需要一种不依赖于土壤物理或水文特性的难以接近,耗时和/或昂贵的测量的特定地点的排水系统设计方法。这就需要一种标准化的方法来解释田间给定土壤的排水特性。首先,我们提出了一种新的可视化土壤评估方法,称为可视化排水评估(VDA),其中使用七个指标(渗水,平整层,质地,孔隙度,稠度,石材含量和根部发育)为特定地点的排水系统设计提供了基础。在爱尔兰西南部的六个排水不良的地点(大小为1.3公顷至2.6公顷)中,比较了基于VDA的设计与(i)理想设计(利用土壤物理测量来阐明土壤水力参数)和(ii)标准根据地下水位控制和降雨补给/排水量的模型估算设计(间距为15 m的0.8 m深排水沟)。与标准设计等效物不同,VDA方法提供了理想设计的良好近似(根据测得的水文特性),并在现场规定了等效的地面排水系统。 VDA(13.3毫米/天)和理想(12.0毫米/天)设计的平均建模降雨补给/排水量比标准设计(0.5毫米/天)显着更高(P <0.001,se 1.42毫米/天) ),假设设计的最低地下水位深度为0.45 m。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号