首页> 外文期刊>Investigative radiology >Comparison of the mechanical thrombectomy efficacy of the Amplatz thrombectomy device and the Cragg thrombolytic brush in vitro.
【24h】

Comparison of the mechanical thrombectomy efficacy of the Amplatz thrombectomy device and the Cragg thrombolytic brush in vitro.

机译:在体外比较Amplatz血栓切除术器械和Cragg溶栓刷的机械血栓切除术疗效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of thrombectomy (without thrombolytic agents) for the Amplatz thrombectomy device (ATD) and the Cragg thrombolytic brush catheter (CBC) in vitro. METHODS: Thrombectomy was performed with the ATD or CBC (6F) in a flow model. Embolus sizes, weight, remaining thrombus, and activation time were evaluated. RESULTS: No significant difference in the activation time was found. The CBC produced significantly less embolism (3.3% vs. 0.03% in the 5-mm and 89% vs. 0.5% in the 7-mm model), but also much more thrombus remained in the system than with the ATD (1% vs. 41% in the 5-mm and 0.1% vs. 62% in the 7-mm model). CONCLUSIONS: The ATD can remove almost all thrombus (99%), whereas the CBC removes only up to 60%, producing fewer emboli than the ATD. This might be due to the lower rotational speed of the CBC compared with the ATD, which is 20 times greater. The soft nylon brush offers less resistance and shear force toward the thrombus than the stainless-steel impeller of the ATD. Because of the large amount of remaining thrombus, the CBC should not be used without lytic agents.
机译:理由和目的:在体外确定Amplatz血栓切除术设备(ATD)和Cragg溶血栓刷导管(CBC)的血栓切除术(无溶栓剂)的疗效。方法:在血流模型中使用ATD或CBC(6F)进行血栓切除术。评估了栓子的大小,重量,残留血栓和激活时间。结果:激活时间没有发现显着差异。 CBC产生的栓塞明显更少(5毫米中的3.3%比0.03%,7毫米模型中的89%比0.5%),但是与ATD相比,系统中残留的血栓更多(1%对5毫米中为41%,而7毫米模型中为0.1%,而62%)。结论:ATD可以清除几乎所有血栓(99%),而CBC最多可以清除60%,产生的栓子少于ATD。这可能是由于CBC的旋转速度比ATD的旋转速度低20倍。与ATD的不锈钢叶轮相比,柔软的尼龙刷对血栓的阻力和剪切力更小。由于大量残留血栓,因此如果没有溶解剂,则不应使用CBC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号