首页> 外文期刊>Inwood >Australia calls for review of certification schemes
【24h】

Australia calls for review of certification schemes

机译:澳大利亚呼吁审查认证计划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When Australian forestry minister Eric Abetz recently called for a review of forest certification schemes, he took a very public swipe at the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and struck a chord with many in the wood industry. But, as Elizabeth Howarthdiscovered, others are wondering if there is a hidden political agenda. FOUNDED IN 1994 WITH support from leading ENGOs, including the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and Greenpeace, the FSC has consistently adopted what, in the eyes of some, is an arrogant stance. It frequently describes itself as the only certification scheme worth the paper it's written on, a position publicly supported by the WWF. When seeking the essential international accreditation, the Australian Forestry Standard (AFS) chose the FSC's big global rival, the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC). While the majority of Australia's certified plantation forests are now under this scheme, the FSC does have a significant following and there are moves afoot to establish a transtasman plantation standard under the council's banner.
机译:当澳大利亚林业部长埃里克·阿贝茨(Eric Abetz)最近呼吁对森林认证计划进行审查时,他在森林管理委员会(FSC)上进行了非常公开的审查,并引起了许多木材行业的共鸣。但是,正如伊丽莎白·霍华斯(Elizabeth Howarth)所发现的那样,其他人则想知道是否存在隐藏的政治议程。 FSC成立于1994年,在包括世界野生动物基金会(WWF)和绿色和平组织在内的主要ENGO的支持下,FSC始终采用某些人的傲慢立场。它经常将自己描述为唯一值得撰写论文的认证方案,这一立场得到了世界自然基金会的公开支持。在寻求基本的国际认证时,澳大利亚林业标准(AFS)选择了FSC的全球主要竞争对手,即森林认证认可计划(PEFC)。尽管澳大利亚大多数认证的人工林目前都在此计划下,但FSC确实拥有大量的追随者,并且正在采取行动以在理事会的旗帜下建立跨界人工林标准。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Inwood》 |2007年第72期|共4页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 林业;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号