首页> 外文期刊>International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction >Choice of pelvic organ prolapse surgery: Vaginal or abdominal, native tissue or synthetic grafts, open abdominal versus laparoscopic or robotic
【24h】

Choice of pelvic organ prolapse surgery: Vaginal or abdominal, native tissue or synthetic grafts, open abdominal versus laparoscopic or robotic

机译:盆腔器官脱垂手术的选择:阴道或腹部,天然组织或人造移植物,开放式腹腔镜与腹腔镜或机器人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and their doctors have an increasing number of options and surgical choices. Conservative treatment with a vaginal pessary will successively reduce POP and treat symptoms in most cases, but the patient will require lifetime care of the pessary including regular cleaning and replacement. Surgery is an effective treatment but has operative morbidity and a recurrence rate. The risks of surgery will vary with the type of operation performed. In theory at least, operation selection should be based on what suits the needs of the patient best: what is the most effective and safest way to surgically correct her POP? This is not a simple matter, as what may be more effective may have a higher morbidity.
机译:有症状的盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的妇女及其医生的选择和手术选择越来越多。在大多数情况下,阴道阴道子宫托的保守治疗将连续减少POP并治疗症状,但是患者需要对子宫托进行终生护理,包括定期清洁和更换。手术是一种有效的治疗方法,但具有手术发病率和复发率。手术的风险会因手术类型而异。至少从理论上讲,手术选择应基于最适合患者需求的选择:通过手术纠正其POP的最有效,最安全的方法是什么?这不是一件简单的事情,因为可能更有效的方法可能具有更高的发病率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号