首页> 外文期刊>International Orthopaedics >Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. A four-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. A four-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

机译:股骨颈移位骨折患者的单极半髋置换与双极半髋置换。随机对照试验的四年随访

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: The treatment of choice for a displaced femoral neck fracture in the most elderly patients is a cemented hemiarthroplasty (HA). The optimal design, unipolar or bipolar head, remains unclear. The possible advantages of a bipolar HA are a better range of motion and less acetabular wear. The aim of this study was to evaluate hip function, health related quality of life (HRQoL), surgical outcome and acetabular erosion in a medium-term follow-up. Methods: One hundred and twenty patients aged 80 or more with a displaced fracture of the femoral neck (Garden III and IV) were randomised to treatment with a cemented Exeter HA using a unipolar or a bipolar head. All patients were able to walk independently, with or without aids, before surgery. Follow-ups were performed at four, 12, 24 and 48 months postoperatively. Assessments included HRQoL (EQ-5D index score), hip function (Harris hip score [HHS]) and radiological acetabular erosion. Results: The mean EQ-5D index score was generally higher among the patients with bipolar hemiarthroplasties at the follow-ups with a significant difference at 48 months: unipolar HAs 0.59 and bipolar HAs 0.70 (p = 0.04). There was an increased rate of acetabular erosion among the patients with unipolar hemiarthroplasties at the early follow-ups with a significant difference at 12 months (unipolar HAs 20 % and bipolar HAs 5 %, p = 0.03). At the later follow-ups the incidence of acetabular erosion accelerated in the bipolar group, and there were no significant differences between the groups at the 24- and 48-month follow-ups. There was no difference in HHS or reoperation rate between the groups at any of the follow-ups. Conclusion: The bipolar HAs seem to result in better HRQoL beyond the first two years after surgery compared to unipolar HAs. Bipolar HAs displayed a later onset of acetabular erosion compared to unipolar HAs.
机译:目的:在大多数老年患者中,股骨颈移位骨折的首选治疗方法是骨水泥置换术(HA)。最佳设计,单极或双极头,仍不清楚。双极HA的可能优点是运动范围更大,髋臼磨损更少。这项研究的目的是在中期随访中评估髋关节功能,健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL),手术结局和髋臼侵蚀。方法:将120名年龄在80岁或以上且股骨颈移位的患者(花园III和花园IV)随机分配到采用单极或双极头固定水泥Exeter HA治疗。所有患者在手术前都能独立行走,无论有无辅助装置。术后4、12、24和48个月进行随访。评估包括HRQoL(EQ-5D指数评分),髋功能(Harris髋评分[HHS])和放射学髋臼侵蚀。结果:双极半髋置换术后患者的平均EQ-5D指数得分较高,在48个月时有显着差异:单极HAs为0.59,双极HAs为0.70(p = 0.04)。在早期随访中,单极半髋置换患者的髋臼侵蚀率增加,在12个月时有显着差异(单极HAs为20%,双极HAs为5%,p = 0.03)。在随后的随访中,双极组的髋臼侵蚀发生率加快,并且在24个月和48个月的随访中两组之间没有显着差异。在任何随访中,两组之间的HHS或再手术率均无差异。结论:与单极HAs相比,双极HAs在手术后的前两年似乎会产生更好的HRQoL。与单极HAs相比,双极HAs发生髋臼侵蚀的发生较晚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号