首页> 外文期刊>International Orthopaedics >Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. A four-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. A four-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

机译:单位半导体塑料与双极半臂成形术治疗患者股骨颈骨折患者。 随机对照试验的四年随访

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: The treatment of choice for a displaced femoral neck fracture in the most elderly patients is a cemented hemiarthroplasty (HA). The optimal design, unipolar or bipolar head, remains unclear. The possible advantages of a bipolar HA are a better range of motion and less acetabular wear. The aim of this study was to evaluate hip function, health related quality of life (HRQoL), surgical outcome and acetabular erosion in a medium-term follow-up. Methods: One hundred and twenty patients aged 80 or more with a displaced fracture of the femoral neck (Garden III and IV) were randomised to treatment with a cemented Exeter HA using a unipolar or a bipolar head. All patients were able to walk independently, with or without aids, before surgery. Follow-ups were performed at four, 12, 24 and 48 months postoperatively. Assessments included HRQoL (EQ-5D index score), hip function (Harris hip score [HHS]) and radiological acetabular erosion. Results: The mean EQ-5D index score was generally higher among the patients with bipolar hemiarthroplasties at the follow-ups with a significant difference at 48 months: unipolar HAs 0.59 and bipolar HAs 0.70 (p = 0.04). There was an increased rate of acetabular erosion among the patients with unipolar hemiarthroplasties at the early follow-ups with a significant difference at 12 months (unipolar HAs 20 % and bipolar HAs 5 %, p = 0.03). At the later follow-ups the incidence of acetabular erosion accelerated in the bipolar group, and there were no significant differences between the groups at the 24- and 48-month follow-ups. There was no difference in HHS or reoperation rate between the groups at any of the follow-ups. Conclusion: The bipolar HAs seem to result in better HRQoL beyond the first two years after surgery compared to unipolar HAs. Bipolar HAs displayed a later onset of acetabular erosion compared to unipolar HAs.
机译:目的:在最老年患者中对位移的股骨颈部骨折的选择是一种粘合的半啮合术(HA)。最佳设计,单极或双极头仍然不清楚。双极HA的可能优点是较好的运动范围和较少的髋臼磨损。本研究的目的是评估髋关节功能,健康相关的生活质量(HRQOL),手术结果和中期随访中的髋臼侵蚀。方法:用股骨颈(花园III和IV)的置换骨折10岁以上80或更多的患者用单极或双极头用稠合的Exeter HA进行随机处理。所有患者都能够在手术前独立行走,有或没有艾滋病行走。随访术后4,12,24和48个月进行。评估包括HRQOL(EQ-5D指数评分),髋关节功能(Harris HIP评分[HHS])和放射性髋臼侵蚀。结果:平均EQ-5D指数评分通常在48个月内具有显着差异的双极性半升塑料患者中的患者中较高:单极性有0.59,双极性为0.70(P = 0.04)。在早期随访中,在12个月内具有显着差异的单极半升塑料患者患者患者侵蚀率增加了(UniPolar有20%,双极有5%,P = 0.03)。在后续后续后续后,双相组在双相组中加速的髋臼侵蚀的发生率,在24-个月和48个月的后续行动中没有显着差异。任何后续后续的组之间的HHS或重组率没有差异。结论:与单极相比,双极似乎导致术后前两年更好的HRQOL。与单极存在相比,双极显示出后来的髋臼腐蚀。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号