首页> 外文期刊>International Orthopaedics >Is percutaneous cement augmentation sufficient for all kinds of vertebral osteoporotic fractures?
【24h】

Is percutaneous cement augmentation sufficient for all kinds of vertebral osteoporotic fractures?

机译:经皮水泥骨增强术足以治疗各种椎骨骨质疏松性骨折吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

I read with great interest the original article by Saracen and Kotwica [1] entitled "Treatment of multiple osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures by percutaneous cement augmentation" published recently in your most valuable journal. In this article, the authors concluded that vertebroplasty should be seriously taken into account as a primary method of treatment in patients with multiple osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. I have many questions concerning the procedure: 1. The authors augment only two vertebrae but never two adjacent ones. The first procedures were performed in the most painful areas. A total of 146 patients had three or more fractured vertebrae; thus how do the authors decide which are the painful vertebrae? According to the clinical or radiological examination? Radiologically, the most compressed one may not be painful. It may be healed with fibrosis. I believe the indication for percutaneous vertebroplasty and decision-making for the exact number of levels to be cemented is biased by being subjected to individual surgeon's preference instead of an underlying standardized study protocol for diagnostic screening and surgical indication.
机译:我非常感兴趣地阅读了最近在您最有价值的期刊上发表的Saracen和Kotwica [1]发表的题为“通过经皮水泥骨水泥治疗多发性骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折”的文章。在本文中,作者得出结论,对于多发性骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的患者,应认真考虑椎体成形术作为主要治疗方法。关于程序,我有很多问题:1.作者仅增加了两个椎骨,但没有增加两个相邻的椎骨。最初的手术是在最痛苦的地方进行的。共有146例患者的椎骨骨折超过三个。因此,作者如何确定哪些是疼痛的椎骨?根据临床或影像学检查?在放射学上,最受压的可能并不痛苦。纤维化可以治愈。我认为,经皮椎体成形术和要确定的确切骨水泥水平的决定的适应症是受个体外科医生的偏爱,而不是用于诊断性筛查和手术适应症的基础标准化研究方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号