首页> 外文期刊>International journal of nursing studies >Do implementation strategies increase adherence to pain assessment in hospitals? A systematic review
【24h】

Do implementation strategies increase adherence to pain assessment in hospitals? A systematic review

机译:实施策略是否会增加医院对疼痛评估的依从性?系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: Pain assessment and reassessment is an essential part of the treatment of hospitalised patients and must be integrated in pain management protocols. Yet nurses' adherence to pain assessment recommendations is problematic. We sought to review the comparative evidence for implementation strategies aiming to improve nurses' adherence to pain assessment recommendations in hospitalised patients. Design: Systematic review using the narrative method. Data sources: PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, Cochrane library and hand searching. Review methods: Studies published since 1990, reporting implementation strategies that aimed to improve nurses' adherence to pain assessment recommendations in hospitalised patients were included. According to the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care group (EPOC) classification system, strategies were categorized as directed at: health professionals, organizations, financing, or regulations. Given the heterogeneity in strategies, samples, outcomes and settings, evidence from the studies was synthesized using a narrative approach. Results: From 743 initial citations, 23 studies were included. They reported a variety of implementation strategies, but only directed at health professionals and/or organizations. In seven studies, a single strategy was applied (e.g. education or feedback). The remaining 16 studies used multifaceted approaches. The effectiveness of the implementation strategies varied. In all studies but one, adherence rates had improved after implementation compared to the before measurement, by 9% up to 49%. These effects were measured at different time points after completion of the implementation, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months. Half of the reviewed studies reported an adherence rate of 80% or higher after implementation activities; other reported rates ranging from 24 to 80%. In two controlled studies the adherence to pain assessment recommendations increased significantly when feedback was provided compared to no feedback. Sustained effects were reported in three studies. Conclusions: Based on this systematic review we conclude that implementation strategies to improve nurses' adherence to pain assessment recommendations vary but generally address professionals and organizational aspects. Educational and feedback strategies are often used and seem largely effective.Due to the heterogeneity of the implementation strategies it is not possible to recommend one preferred strategy. The level of evidence for strategies to improve pain assessment recommendations is limited however, as well-conducted studies are lacking. ? 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
机译:目标:疼痛评估和重新评估是住院患者治疗的重要组成部分,必须纳入疼痛管理方案中。然而,护士坚持疼痛评估建议存在问题。我们试图审查实施策略的比较证据,旨在提高护士对住院患者的疼痛评估建议的依从性。设计:使用叙述方法进行系统评价。数据来源:PubMed(MEDLINE),CINAHL,Cochrane库和人工搜索。审查方法:自1990年以来发表的研究报告了实施策略,旨在改善护士对住院患者的疼痛评估建议的依从性。根据Cochrane有效实践和护理组织(EPOC)分类系统,对策略进行了分类,针对的对象是:卫生专业人员,组织,财务或法规。考虑到策略,样本,结果和设置的异质性,使用叙事方法综合了研究的证据。结果:从743次初始引用中,包括23项研究。他们报告了各种实施策略,但仅针对卫生专业人员和/或组织。在七项研究中,仅采用了一种策略(例如教育或反馈)。其余16项研究使用了多方面的方法。实施策略的有效性各不相同。除一项研究外,在所有研究中,实施后的依从率均比测量前提高了9%,最高达到49%。在实施完成后的不同时间点(从2周到6个月不等)测量这些效果。一半的审查研究报告说,实施活动后遵守率达到80%或更高;其他报告的比率从24%到80%不等。在两项对照研究中,与没有反馈相比,提供反馈时对疼痛评估建议的遵守显着增加。在三项研究中报告了持续的作用。结论:基于此系统评价,我们得出结论,旨在提高护士对疼痛评估建议的依从性的实施策略各不相同,但通常针对专业人员和组织方面。教育和反馈策略经常被使用并且似乎在很大程度上是有效的。由于实施策略的异质性,不可能推荐一种首选策略。然而,由于缺乏进行良好的研究,改善疼痛评估建议的策略的证据水平有限。 ? 2012爱思唯尔有限公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号