首页> 外文期刊>International psychogeriatrics >What explains variations in the clinical use of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) as a diagnostic category?
【24h】

What explains variations in the clinical use of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) as a diagnostic category?

机译:是什么解释了轻度认知障碍(MCI)作为诊断类别的临床用途的差异?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is proposed to describe the transitional stage between normal cognitive aging and dementia. It has had significant impact in the field of dementia research, but it remains controversial whether or not it should be used as a diagnostic category in clinical practice. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with international experts (N = 37) in the field of dementia research and practice. These interviews explored the advantages and difficulties of using MCI as a clinical diagnosis. RESULTS: There is wide variation in the clinical use of MCI. This variation depends on institutional factors and two types of cultural factors: (a) clinical culture, and (b) the "evidential culture" -- how research and guidelines figure in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The study shows the importance of combining values-based practice with evidence-based practice in the early diagnosis of dementia.
机译:背景:轻度认知障碍(MCI)被提出来描述正常认知衰老和痴呆之间的过渡阶段。它在痴呆研究领域具有重大影响,但是在临床实践中是否应将其用作诊断类别仍存在争议。方法:与痴呆症研究和实践领域的国际专家(N = 37)进行了半结构式访谈。这些访谈探讨了使用MCI作为临床诊断的优点和困难。结果:MCI的临床使用差异很大。这种差异取决于制度因素和两种文化因素:(a)临床文化,和(b)“证据文化”-研究和指南如何在临床实践中体现出来。结论:该研究表明在痴呆的早期诊断中将基于价值的实践与基于证据的实践相结合的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号