...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of sports medicine >Leg heating and cooling influences running stride parameters but not running economy.
【24h】

Leg heating and cooling influences running stride parameters but not running economy.

机译:腿部加热和冷却会影响跑步步幅参数,但不会影响跑步经济性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To evaluate the effect of temperature on running economy (RE) and stride parameters in 10 trained male runners (VO2peak 60.8 +/- 6.8 ml . kg (-1) . min (-1)), we used water immersion as a passive temperature manipulation to contrast localised pre-heating, pre-cooling, and thermoneutral interventions prior to running. Runners completed three 10-min treadmill runs at 70 % VO2peak following 40 min of randomised leg immersion in water at 21.0 degrees C (cold), 34.6 degrees C (thermoneutral), or 41.8 degrees C (hot). Treadmill runs were separated by 7 days. External respiratory gas exchange was measured for 30 s before and throughout the exercise and stride parameters were determined from video analysis in the sagittal plane. RE was not affected by prior heating or cooling with no difference in oxygen cost or energy expenditure between the temperature interventions (average VO2 3rd-10th min of exercise: C, 41.6 +/- 3.4 ml . kg (-1) . min (-1); TN, 41.6 +/- 3.0; H, 41.8 +/- 3.5; p = 0.94). Exercise heart rate was affected by temperature (H > TN > C; p < 0.001). During minutes 3 - 5 of running the respiratory-exchange and minute ventilation/oxygen consumption ratios were greater in cold compared with thermoneutral (p < 0.05). Averaged over the full 10 min of exercise, stride length was shorter and stride frequency higher for the C trial compared to TN and H (p < 0.01). Leg temperature manipulation did not influence running economy despite changes in stride parameters that might indicate restricted muscle-tendon elasticity after pre-cooling. Larger changes in stride mechanics than those produced by the current temperature intervention are required to influence running economy.
机译:为了评估温度对10位训练有素的男性跑步者(VO2peak 60.8 +/- 6.8 ml。kg(-1)。min(-1))的跑步经济性(RE)和步幅参数的影响,我们将水浸入作为被动温度进行操作以对比运行前的局部预热,预冷和热中性干预。跑步者在21.0摄氏度(冷),34.6摄氏度(热中性)或41.8摄氏度(热)中将腿部随机浸入水中40分钟后,在70%VO2peak下完成了三个10分钟的跑步机跑步。跑步机间隔7天。在整个运动之前和整个运动过程中,进行了3​​0 s的外部呼吸气体交换测量,并通过矢状面的视频分析确定了步幅参数。 RE不受先前加热或冷却的影响,温度干预之间的氧气成本或能量消耗没有差异(运动第3至10分钟的平均VO2:C,41.6 +/- 3.4 ml。kg(-1).min(- 1); TN,41.6 +/- 3.0; H,41.8 +/- 3.5; p = 0.94)。运动心率受温度影响(H> TN> C; p <0.001)。在运行的第3-5分钟中,与热中性相比,寒冷时的呼吸交换和分钟通气/氧气消耗比更大(p <0.05)。与TN和H相比,C试验的整个运动10分钟的平均步幅较短,步幅频率较高(p <0.01)。尽管步幅参数的变化可能表明预冷后肌肉肌腱弹性受到限制,但腿部温度的操纵并不会影响跑步的经济性。为了影响运行经济性,需要跨步力学的变化要大于当前温度干预所产生的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号