...
首页> 外文期刊>Infectious disorders drug targets >Pilot randomised controlled trial to test effectiveness of facemasks in preventing influenza-like illness transmission among Australian hajj pilgrims in 2011
【24h】

Pilot randomised controlled trial to test effectiveness of facemasks in preventing influenza-like illness transmission among Australian hajj pilgrims in 2011

机译:2011年试行随机对照试验以测试口罩在预防澳大利亚朝圣者中流感样疾病传播方面的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Studies to determine the effectiveness of facemasks in preventing influenza have been inconclusive, largely due to small sample size. The Hajj pilgrimage, where the incidence of influenza and other respiratory infections is high, provides an excellent opportunity to test the effectiveness of facemasks against syndromic and laboratory-confirmed infections. Hence, a pilot study was conducted among Australian pilgrims to assess the feasibility of such a large-scale trial in the coming years. At the 2011 Hajj, tents were randomised to ‘supervised mask use’ versus ‘no supervised mask use’. Pilgrims with ILI symptoms for ≤3 days were recruited as ‘cases’ and those who slept within 2 meters of them as ‘contacts’. Surgical facemasks were provided to cases and contacts in the ‘mask’ tents, but not in the ‘control’ tents. Pilgrims in both groups were given diaries to record their respiratory symptoms. Nasal or pharyngeal swabs were collected from the cases and contacts with ILI for point-of-care and nucleic acid tests. A total of 22 tents were randomised to ‘mask’ (n=12) or ‘control’ (n=10). There were 164 pilgrims recruited; 75 in ‘mask’ and 89 in ‘control’ group. Mask use compliance was 76% in the ‘mask’ group and 12% in the ‘control’ group. Based on developing syndromic ILI, less contacts became symptomatic in the ‘mask’ tents compared to the ‘control’ tents (31% versus 53%, p= 0.04). However, laboratory results did not show any difference between the two groups. This pilot study shows that a large trial to assess the effectiveness of facemasks use at Hajj is feasible.
机译:确定面罩预防流感的有效性的研究尚无定论,这主要是由于样本量小。朝圣之旅在流感和其他呼吸道感染的发生率很高的地方,提供了一个绝佳的机会来测试口罩对综合症和实验室确认的感染的有效性。因此,在澳大利亚朝圣者中进行了一项试点研究,以评估在未来几年中进行这种大规模试验的可行性。在2011年朝Ha时,帐篷被随机分为“监督使用口罩”和“不监督使用口罩”。患有ILI症状≤3天的朝圣者被招募为“案件”,而睡在2米之内的朝圣者被称为“联络人”。在“口罩”帐篷中为病例和接触者提供了外科口罩,但在“控制”帐篷中没有为这些病例和接触者提供外科口罩。给两组朝圣者写日记,记录他们的呼吸道症状。从病例中收集鼻拭子或咽拭子,并与ILI接触以进行即时护理和核酸检测。总共22个帐篷被随机分为“面具”(n = 12)或“对照”(n = 10)。招募了164名朝圣者; “掩码”组中为75,“控制组”中为89。 “口罩”组中口罩的使用依从性为76%,“对照”组中为12%。根据发展的综合症状性ILI,与“控制”帐篷相比,“面具”帐篷的症状较少(31%对53%,p = 0.04)。但是,实验室结果未显示两组之间有任何差异。这项初步研究表明,进行大规模的试验以评估朝j使用口罩的有效性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号