...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Poultry Science >Maximum profit feed formulation of broilers: 2. Comparison among different nutritional models.
【24h】

Maximum profit feed formulation of broilers: 2. Comparison among different nutritional models.

机译:肉鸡的最大利润饲料配方:2.不同营养模型之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Four economic nutritional models including a constant calorie-nutrient ratio (C-E:P), a variable calorie-protein ratio (V-E:Pg), a constant protein-amino acid ratio (DBP) and a variable calorie-protein ratio for the finisher period (V-E:Pd) were compared in terms of relative performance, economic nutrient requirements and profitability based on relative performance expressed as a function of nutrients, relative or real prices of feedstuffs and broilers and maximum profit feed formulation. The relative body weight or feed intake in response to nutrient contents tended to increase or decrease respectively with particular differences for each model. The economic nutrient requirements were different for each model such as 3.139 Mcal/kg for C-E:P, 2.968 Mcal/kg and 20.7% of protein for V-E:Pg model, 22.44% of protein for DBP model, 3.167 Mcal/kg for V-E:Pd and 3.134 Mcal/kg for C-E:P-3.15 model. As the price of broilers or corn increased, the energy or protein content was increased for C-E:P, V-E:Pg and DBP models except the energy level of V-E:Pg model. However, as the Soybean Meal (SBM) or poultry oil price increased, the energy or protein content was reduced for the three models indicated above except the energy level of V-E:Pg model. Energy levels of the V-E:Pd model were kept almost constant as the broiler or ingredient price raised. Under relative price of feedstuffs and broilers the best profits depended on the model used, being more economical when the broiler or corn price increased for the C-E:P or DBP models respectively. The best profitability using real price of broiler, corn or SBM for twelve months came from the C-E:P model followed by the DBP model. From the two models, V-E:Pd and C-E:P-3.15 models, the V-E:Pd model had the best benefit but with a narrow range of growth response and economic conditions. These data suggest that the C-E:P model is the best method of formulation to maximize performance or profitability; however, for some corn price variation the DBP model can be more profitable though the carcass quality can be negatively affected.
机译:四种经济营养模型,包括肥育期恒定的卡路里营养比(CE:P),可变的卡路里蛋白质比(VE:Pg),恒定的蛋白质氨基酸比(DBP)和可变的卡路里蛋白质比(VE:Pd)在相对性能,经济营养需要量和基于相对性能的获利能力方面进行了比较,相对性能表示为养分,饲料和肉鸡的相对或实际价格以及最大利润饲料配方的函数。对于每种模型,相对于营养物含量的相对体重或采食量趋于分别增加或减少,具有特定的差异。每个模型的经济营养需求不同,例如CE:P为3.139 Mcal / kg,VE:Pg模型为2.968 Mcal / kg和蛋白质的20.7%,DBP模型为22.44%蛋白质,VE为3.167 Mcal / kg: CE:P-3.15模型的Pd和3.134 Mcal / kg。随着肉鸡或玉米价格的上涨,C-E:P,V-E:Pg和DBP模型的能量或蛋白质含量增加,V-E:Pg模型的能量水平除外。但是,随着大豆粉(SBM)或家禽油价格的上涨,除了V-E:Pg模型的能级以外,上述三个模型的能量或蛋白质含量都降低了。随着肉鸡或原料价格的上涨,V-E:Pd模型的能量水平几乎保持恒定。在饲料和肉鸡的相对价格下,最佳利润取决于所使用的模型,而当C-E:P或DBP模型的肉鸡或玉米价格分别上涨时,则更为经济。使用肉鸡,玉米或SBM的实际价格来获得十二个月的最佳盈利能力来自C-E:P模型,其次是DBP模型。从V-E:Pd和C-E:P-3.15这两个模型中,V-E:Pd模型具有最佳收益,但增长响应和经济条件的范围很窄。这些数据表明,C-E:P模型是使业绩或利润最大化的最好的表述方法。然而,尽管some体质量可能受到不利影响,但对于某些玉米价格变化,DBP模型可能会更有利可图。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号