首页> 外文期刊>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology >Voice quality of prepubescent children with quiescent recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.
【24h】

Voice quality of prepubescent children with quiescent recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.

机译:青春期前儿童复发性反复呼吸性乳头状瘤的语音质量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term impact of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) and its treatment on voice quality in prepubescent children. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study. METHODS: Prepubescent children with RRP in remission for at least 12 [according to MM section] months were asked to participate. Remission was documented by absence of papillomas on fiberoptic flexible laryngoscopy. An age- and sex-matched control was selected for each patient enrolled. Voice was evaluated using the voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL) questionnaire, perceptual evaluations of voice quality by speech-language pathologists using the GRBAS (grade of hoarseness, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain) scale, and acoustic analysis (fundamental frequency, maximal phonation time, and relative average perturbation) using the Visi-Pitch II 3300. RESULTS: Medical records of 84 patients were reviewed and 15 met study criteria. Five agreed to participate but one was excluded due to the presence of papillomas. The four study patients and four matched controls were between 9- and 11-years old. On the V-RQOL questionnaire, each control rated V-RQOL as normal (10/50) and the average patient group score was within the normal range (11.5/50). On perceptual evaluations, the patient's voices were more hoarse, breathy, and rough compared to controls'. Acoustic analysis showed that patients' voices had a lower average fundamental frequency (F(0)) (200 Hz compared to 243 Hz for controls) and a higher relative average perturbation (RAP) (1.10 compared to 0.77), although only one patient's voice actually had elevated RAP (2.89), which had a large impact on raising the average score for the patient group. The average maximal phonation times were similar for the two groups (7.8s for patients and 7.4s for controls) but lower than average normal scores reported in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Although children with RRP do not perceive their voice quality to have a negative impact on V-RQOL, speech-language pathologist evaluations and acoustic measurements show objective differences between the voices of children with quiescent RRP and those of normal, healthy controls.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估青春期前复发性呼吸性乳头状瘤病(RRP)的长期影响及其对语音质量的影响。研究设计:病例对照研究。方法:要求RRP缓解的青春期前儿童至少12个月(根据MM节)。纤维状柔性喉镜检查显示无乳头状瘤可缓解。为每个入选的患者选择年龄和性别匹配的对照。使用语音相关的生活质量(V-RQOL)问卷评估语音,语音语言病理学家使用GRBAS(声音嘶哑,粗糙度,呼吸,虚弱,劳损等级)量表和声学分析对语音质量进行感知评估(基本频率,最大发声时间和相对平均摄动)使用Visi-Pitch II3300。结果:回顾了84例患者的医疗记录,其中15例符合研究标准。五人同意参加,但由于存在乳头状瘤而被排除在外。四名研究患者和四个匹配的对照年龄在9至11岁之间。在V-RQOL调查表上,每个对照组将V-RQOL评定为正常(10/50),平均患者组得分在正常范围内(11.5 / 50)。通过感知评估,与对照组相比,患者的声音更加沙哑,呼吸和粗糙。声学分析表明,尽管只有一名患者的声音,但患者的声音具有较低的平均基本频率(F(0))(200 Hz,而对照组为243 Hz)和较高的相对平均扰动(RAP)(1.10,而为0.77)。实际上有较高的RAP(2.89),这对提高患者组的平均得分有很大影响。两组的平均最大发声时间相似(患者为7.8s,对照组为7.4s),但低于文献中报道的平均正常评分。结论:尽管RRP患儿并没有感觉到语音质量对V-RQOL有负面影响,但语音病理学家的评估和声学测量显示,静态RRP患儿的声音与正常健康对照组的声音之间存在客观差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号