首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Modern Physics, C. Physics and Computers >The interplay of self-reflection, social interaction and random events in the dynamics of opinion flow in two-party democracies
【24h】

The interplay of self-reflection, social interaction and random events in the dynamics of opinion flow in two-party democracies

机译:自我反思,社会互动和随机事件在两党制民主国家的意见动态中的相互作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We propose a continuous process opinion formation model to study the dynamics of a multilevel relationship between voters, political parties, and facts in two-party democratic elections. In our model, opinions can take any real value between two extremes and an unaligned, moderate opinion state without a preference. Starting with a random opinion configuration, individual voter opinions evolve and change over time due to self-reflection, inter-personal communication, external media influence, and noise. Parties are influenced by their own ideologies, facts, and voters' opinions. Elections are held periodically and the party that is closer in opinion to the majority of voters forms the new government. The government policy is then expected to be in proximity to the voter opinions and the policies of the currently ruling political party. We analyze the tension of opinions as a measure of how dramatically opinions can disagree within a given sample of voters and the success of the government and parties as the degree of coincidence between the policies and facts. Our model generates realistic quasi-periodic alternations between incumbents and challengers that are typical for two-party systems. Moreover, our model shows that relative to other voters' strategies, conscious voting can lead to more successful governments of not only fact-oriented but also pragmatic and balanced political parties, irrespective of the strategies of the competing opposition parties. In addition, our simulations uncover several interesting features including less victories for strictly ideological or fact-oriented parties unless they include some aspects of populism or pragmatism. In this sense, our model can also describe situations where election outcomes are not necessarily based on votes for the current programs of competing parties and their placement on relevant issues, but instead result from voters' dissatisfaction with the previous government and the votes against it.
机译:我们提出一个连续的过程意见形成模型,以研究选民,政党和两党民主选举中的事实之间的多层次关系。在我们的模型中,观点可以在两个极端之间以及没有偏见的,适度的观点状态之间获得任何实际价值,而不会产生偏好。从随机的意见配置开始,由于自我反思,人际沟通,外部媒体的影响和噪音,个人选民的意见会随着时间的推移而发展和变化。政党受自己的意识形态,事实和选民观点的影响。定期举行选举,与多数选民意见较近的政党组成新政府。届时,预计政府政策将与选民的意见和当前执政党的政策接近。我们分析意见的紧张程度,以衡量意见在给定的选民样本中有多大分歧,以及政府和政党的成功与否(政策与事实之间的一致程度)。我们的模型在两方系统中通常会在现任者和挑战者之间产生现实的准周期交替。而且,我们的模型表明,相对于其他选民的策略,有意识的投票不仅可以使以事实为导向而且可以由务实和平衡的政党组成的更成功的政府,无论竞争的反对党采取何种策略。此外,我们的模拟发现了一些有趣的功能,包括对严格的意识形态或面向事实的政党的胜利,除非它们包括民粹主义或实用主义的某些方面。从这个意义上讲,我们的模型还可以描述以下情况:选举结果不一定基于当前竞争方计划的票数及其在相关问题上的位置,而是因选民对前任政府的不满以及对此票的反对而导致的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号