The criteria of true neutrality would infer that the neutrino is not a truly neutral particle and thus would imply that beta beta o nu decay is forbidden, in agreement with the absence of any evidence of this process so far. Any fundamental interaction admits at least one truly neutral particle as messenger. Materialization through SM interactions corresponds to the creation of a pair of baryon antibaryon or lepton antilepton. These pairs have the same quantum numbers as those of the neutral messenger responsible for their creation. No net change of baryon number or lepton number could be obtained through materialization. But, we know that our present Universe is composed of matter and is electrically neutral. This implies that the number of protons is strictly equal to the number of electrons. A possible scenario is put forward to account for these two fundamental experimental facts. The principle of complementarity would explain the exact balance of protons and electrons. Baryogenesis and leptogenesis would be the two faces of the same phenomenon. This scenario is compatible with the absence of beta beta o nu decay and of proton decay and it does not require the unification of forces. This model could explain the asymmetric but nevertheless electrically neutral Universe; however, it could not account for the numerical value of the tiny excess of matter over antimatter in the early Universe. This value would be incidental. MC force with a structure analogous to that of weak force would ensure the neutrality of our Universe without requiring the strict matter-antimatter symmetry, rendering thus the concept of Universe superfluous. [References: 19]
展开▼
