首页> 外文期刊>International journal of Jungian studies >On the conservatism of post-Jungian criticism: competing concepts of the symbol in Freud, Jung and Walter Benjamin
【24h】

On the conservatism of post-Jungian criticism: competing concepts of the symbol in Freud, Jung and Walter Benjamin

机译:关于后荣格主义批评的保守主义:弗洛伊德,荣格和沃尔特·本杰明的符号竞争概念

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The rencwed interest in analytical psychology by academics wroking in the humanities has led to the emergence of a post-Jungian field of cultrual criticism, at the theoretical core of which stands Jung's theory of symboilsm. This article examines the centrality of symbolism to both Freud and Jung's psychology and explains how the differing concepts of the symbol lead to their divergent theories of interpretation in psychology and art criticism. Acknowledging the advantages of Jung's more expansive account of the symbol, it argues that Walter Benjamin's critical engagement with Jung nonetheless provides a useful correction to the problematic conservatism inherent to his concept of the symbol and its contemporary application.
机译:人文学科的学者对分析心理学的重新认识引起了后荣格文化批评领域的兴起,其理论核心是荣格的共生理论。本文探讨了符号主义在弗洛伊德和荣格心理学中的中心地位,并解释了符号的不同概念如何导致他们在心理学和艺术批评中的不同解释理论。承认荣格(Jung)对符号的更广泛描述的优势,它认为沃尔特·本杰明(Walter Benjamin)与荣格(Jung)的批判性接触提供了有益的修正,以纠正其符号概念及其当代应用所固有的有问题的保守主义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号