首页> 外文期刊>British journal of ophthalmology >Incorrect statistical analysis--giant cell arteritis in Asians: a comparative study.
【24h】

Incorrect statistical analysis--giant cell arteritis in Asians: a comparative study.

机译:错误的统计分析-亚洲人巨大的细胞性动脉炎:一项比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the recently published study by Pereira et al, the authors describe selecting individuals with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis (GCA) and 'new' patients seen in the ophthalmology department at the University of California-San Francisco, who did not have GCA. Four non-GCA patients were matched to each GCA patient, with respect to specific demographic characteristics. Although not explicitly stated, the authors have employed a matched case-control study design, which is appropriate. The authors do, however, describe using Fisher's exact test and logistic regression for their statistical analysis, both of which are inappropriate. This is attributed to the fact that neither accounts for the matched nature of the study design. The authors are strongly urged to conduct a reanalysis of their study data and provide readers with the appropriate measures of association and p values, amending their interpretations as warranted.
机译:在Pereira等人最近发表的研究中,作者描述了选择经活检证实的巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)和在加州大学旧金山分校眼科看到的“新”患者的人,这些患者没有GCA。就特定的人口统计学特征,将四名非GCA患者与每名GCA患者进行匹配。尽管没有明确说明,但作者采用了合适的病例对照研究设计。然而,作者的确描述了使用Fisher精确检验和逻辑回归进行统计分析,但这两者都是不合适的。这归因于以下事实:两者均未说明研究设计的匹配性质。强烈建议作者对研究数据进行重新分析,并为读者提供适当的关联度和p值度量,并根据需要修改其解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号