首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Epidemiology: Official Journal of the International Epidemiological Association >A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study.
【24h】

A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study.

机译:一项用于流行病学队列研究的食物频率问卷与24小时召回的比较:基于生物标志物的观察蛋白和能量营养(OPEN)研究的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Most large cohort studies have used a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for assessing dietary intake. Several biomarker studies, however, have cast doubt on whether the FFQ has sufficient precision to allow detection of moderate but important diet-disease associations. We use data from the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study to compare the performance of a FFQ with that of a 24-hour recall (24HR). METHODS: The OPEN study included 484 healthy volunteer participants (261 men, 223 women) from Montgomery County, Maryland, aged 40-69. Each participant was asked to complete a FFQ and 24HR on two occasions 3 months apart, and a doubly labelled water (DLW) assessment and two 24-hour urine collections during the 2 weeks after the first FFQ and 24HR assessment. For both the FFQ and 24HR and for both men and women, we calculated attenuation factors for absolute energy, absolute protein, and protein density. RESULTS: For absolute energy and protein, a single FFQ's attenuation factor is0.04-0.16. Repeat administrations lead to little improvement (0.08-0.19). Attenuation factors for a single 24HR are 0.10-0.20, but four repeats would yield attenuations of 0.20-0.37. For protein density a single FFQ has an attenuation of 0.3-0.4; for a single 24HR the attenuation factor is 0.15-0.25 but would increase to 0.35-0.50 with four repeats. CONCLUSIONS: Because of severe attenuation, the FFQ cannot be recommended as an instrument for evaluating relations between absolute intake of energy or protein and disease. Although this attenuation is lessened in analyses of energy-adjusted protein, it remains substantial for both FFQ and multiple 24HR. The utility of either of these instruments for detecting important but moderate relative risks (between 1.5 and 2.0), even for energy-adjusted dietary factors, is questionable.
机译:背景:大多数大型队列研究均使用食物频率问卷(FFQ)来评估饮食摄入量。但是,一些生物标志物研究对FFQ是否具有足够的精度以检测中度但重要的饮食-疾病关联具有怀疑。我们使用来自观察蛋白和能量营养(OPEN)研究的数据来比较FFQ和24小时召回(24HR)的性能。方法:这项开放研究包括来自马里兰州蒙哥马利县的484名健康志愿者(261名男性,223名女性),年龄在40-69岁之间。要求每位参与者分别在三个月内两次完成FFQ和24HR,并在第一次FFQ和24HR评估后的两周内完成双标签水(DLW)评估和两次24小时尿液收集。对于FFQ和24HR以及男人和女人,我们都计算了绝对能量,绝对蛋白质和蛋白质密度的衰减因子。结果:对于绝对能量和蛋白质,单个FFQ的衰减因子为0.04-0.16。重复给药几乎没有改善(0.08-0.19)。单个24HR的衰减因子为0.10-0.20,但是四次重复将产生0.20-0.37的衰减。对于蛋白质密度,单个FFQ的衰减为0.3-0.4。对于单个24HR,衰减因子为0.15-0.25,但如果重复四次,衰减系数将增加到0.35-0.50。结论:由于严重衰减,不能推荐将FFQ用作评估能量或蛋白质绝对摄入与疾病之间关系的工具。尽管在能量调节蛋白的分析中减弱了这种衰减,但对于FFQ和多个24HR而言,衰减仍然很大。这些工具中的任何一种都无法检测重要但中等的相对风险(1.5至2.0之间),甚至对于能量调节的饮食因素而言也令人怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号