...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Research >Propinox in intestinal colic: multicenter randomized prospective double-blind study of three doses of propinox vs. placebo in acute intestinal colic pain.
【24h】

Propinox in intestinal colic: multicenter randomized prospective double-blind study of three doses of propinox vs. placebo in acute intestinal colic pain.

机译:肠绞痛中的普罗平诺克斯:多剂量随机三项前瞻性双盲研究,研究了三种剂量的普力诺和安慰剂治疗急性肠绞痛的情况。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this double-blind study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of propinox administered i.v. and to establish a dose-response relationship according to three dose levels (10 mg, 20 mg and 30 mg), vs. placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe acute intestinal colic pain. Four hundred patients (100 per treatment group) were included and allocated to the following treatment groups: propinox 10 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg and placebo. All treatments induced significant and progressive pain reduction as from the 20 min evaluation of 20.3% in the placebo group, 45% in the group treated with propinox 10 mg; 52% in the group receiving propinox 20 mg and 56% in the propinox 30 mg group. Statistical comparison showed differences between placebo and the three active doses as well as between propinox 10 mg and the 20 mg and 30 mg doses. The 20 min evaluation revealed that 40% of patients receiving placebo had to be excluded from the study due to lack of efficacy; the percentage of which was significantly higher compared with those observed with the three doses of propinox ranging between 10% and 13%. The 120 min evaluation revealed that 47.7% of patients treated with propinox 10 mg were free from pain vs. 68.8% and 73.5% of those receiving 20 mg and 30 mg, respectively. These percentages were considerably higher than the 15% found with placebo. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the 10 mg vs. the 20 mg and 30 mg groups with not differences between the latter doses. No differences in blood pressure or heart rate were found among treatments. The incidence of mouth dryness was significantly more frequent with the 20 mg and 30 mg doses of propinox than with the placebo or the 10 mg dose.
机译:这项双盲研究的目的是评估经静脉内给药的propinox的功效和耐受性。并根据三种剂量水平(10 mg,20 mg和30 mg)与安慰剂对中度至重度急性肠绞痛的患者建立剂量反应关系。包括四百例患者(每个治疗组100个患者),并将其分配给以下治疗组:普罗诺司汀10 mg,20 mg,30 mg和安慰剂。从20分钟的评估开始,安慰剂组中的所有治疗均导致疼痛的显着和逐步减轻,安慰剂组为20.3%,丙诺酸10 mg治疗组为45%。接受20毫克异丙醇的组中52%,接受30毫克丙酸的组56%。统计学比较显示,安慰剂与三种有效剂量之间以及丙诺啡10 mg与20 mg与30 mg剂量之间存在差异。 20分钟的评估显示,由于缺乏疗效,接受安慰剂的患者中有40%必须被排除在研究之外。与三剂剂量为10%到13%的普鲁诺克斯所观察到的相比,其百分比显着更高。 120分钟的评估显示,接受10 mg丙酸单抗治疗的患者中47.7%没有疼痛,而接受20 mg和30 mg的患者分别为68.8%和73.5%。这些百分比大大高于安慰剂的15%。统计分析显示10 mg组与20 mg组和30 mg组之间存在显着差异,而后者之间没有差异。治疗之间未发现血压或心率差异。服用20 mg和30 mg剂量的普力诺克斯,口干的发生率明显高于安慰剂或10 mg剂量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号