首页> 外文期刊>International journal of clinical oncology >A matched-pair comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with cetuximab versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy with platinum-based chemotherapy for locally advanced head neck cancer
【24h】

A matched-pair comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with cetuximab versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy with platinum-based chemotherapy for locally advanced head neck cancer

机译:西妥昔单抗调强放疗与铂类化疗调强放疗对局部晚期头颈癌的配对配对比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: We retrospectively compared the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and cetuximab (IMRT/cetuximab) versus IMRT and platinum-based chemotherapy (IMRT/platinum) for locally advanced head neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). Methods: Thirty-one IMRT/cetuximab patients were matched 1:2 with 62 IMRT/platinum patients according to primary site and clinical stage. The primary endpoint was locoregional recurrence (LRR), and secondary endpoints included distant metastasis (DM), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Because of inherent selection bias, the IMRT/cetuximab cohort was significantly older and with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index. IMRT/cetuximab and IMRT/platinum did not have significantly different LRR and DM (33 vs. 23 % at 2 years, P = 0.22; 17 vs. 11 % at 2 years, P = 0.40; respectively). IMRT/cetuximab had significantly worse CSS and OS (67 vs. 84 %, P = 0.04; 58 vs. 83 %, P = 0.001; respectively). However, for the subset of elderly patients ≥65 years old, there is no difference between the two cohorts for all endpoints (all P = NS). Conclusion: IMRT/platinum should remain the preferred choice of chemoradiotherapy for LAHNSCC, but IMRT/cetuximab may be a reasonable alternative for elderly patients.
机译:目的:我们回顾性比较了调强放疗(IMRT)和西妥昔单抗(IMRT / cetuximab)与IMRT和铂类化疗(IMRT / Platinum)对局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(LAHNSCC)的疗效。方法:根据主要部位和临床阶段,将31例IMRT /西妥昔单抗患者与62例IMRT /铂类患者按1:2比例配对。主要终点是局部复发(LRR),次要终点包括远处转移(DM),病因特异性生存(CSS)和总体生存(OS)。结果:由于内在的选择偏见,IMRT /西妥昔单抗队列明显更老,并且具有更高的查尔森合并症指数。 IMRT /西妥昔单抗和IMRT /铂的LRR和DM没有显着差异(2年时分别为33%vs. 23%,P = 0.22; 2年时分别为17%vs. 11%,P = 0.40)。 IMRT /西妥昔单抗的CSS和OS明显较差(分别为67比84%,P = 0.04; 58比83%,P = 0.001)。但是,对于≥65岁的老年患者,这两个队列在所有终点之间均无差异(所有P = NS)。结论:IMRT /铂仍然是LAHNSCC放化疗的首选,但是IMRT /西妥昔单抗可能是老年患者的合理选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号