...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cancer =: Journal International du Cancer >Endothelial progenitor cells do not contribute to tumor endothelium in primary and metastatic tumors.
【24h】

Endothelial progenitor cells do not contribute to tumor endothelium in primary and metastatic tumors.

机译:内皮祖细胞在原发性和转移性肿瘤中对肿瘤内皮没有贡献。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Despite extensive research, the contribution of bone-marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells (BM-EPC) to tumor angiogenesis remains controversial. In previous publications, the extent of incorporation of BM-EPCs into the endothelial cell (EC) layer in different tumor models has been reported as significant in some studies but undetectable in others. Here, we studied the differentiation of BM-EPCs and its contribution to tumor vessels in experimental and spontaneous lung metastasis (B16 melanoma and prostate carcinoma), in an autochthonous transgenic model of prostate tumorigenesis, in orthotopically implanted lung tumors [Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC)], in heterotopic subcutaneous models (LLC and C1 prostate carcinoma) growing in green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing bone marrow (BM) chimeras. Immunofluorescence was performed with a set of endothelial and hematopoietic markers and confocal microscopy was used to generate 3D reconstruction images. By performing rigorously conducted morphological studies, we found no evidence of BM-EPCs differentiation into tumor endothelium independently of tumor type, grade and organ site in primary and metastatic tumors. The vast majority of GFP(+) cells were trafficking leucocytes or periendothelial myeloid cells. To explore the possibility that local overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) might increase the numbers of incorporated BM-EPCs, we analyzed tumors genetically manipulated to overexpress VEGF(164). Local VEGF production induces a massive infiltration of bone-marrow-derived cells, but did not lead to vessel wall integration of these cells. Collectively, these findings suggest that during tumor progression vascularization occurs primarily via classical tumor angiogenesis (e.g., sprouting of pre-existing ECs), whereas BM-EPCs do not incorporate into the vessel wall to any significant extent.
机译:尽管进行了广泛的研究,但是骨髓来源的内皮祖细胞(BM-EPC)对肿瘤血管生成的贡献仍然存在争议。在以前的出版物中,已经报道了在不同的肿瘤模型中将BM-EPC掺入内皮细胞(EC)层的程度在某些研究中很重要,但在另一些研究中却无法检测到。在这里,我们在原位植入的肺肿瘤[刘易斯肺癌(LLC)中,在前列腺癌发生的自发转基因模型中,研究了BM-EPC的分化及其在实验性和自发性肺转移(B16黑色素瘤和前列腺癌)中对肿瘤血管的贡献)],在表达绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)的骨髓(BM)嵌合体中生长的异位皮下模型(LLC和C1前列腺癌)中。用一组内皮和造血标志物进行免疫荧光,共聚焦显微镜用于生成3D重建图像。通过进行严格的形态学研究,我们没有发现BM-EPCs分化为肿瘤内皮的证据,而与原发性和转移性肿瘤的肿瘤类型,等级和器官部位无关。绝大多数GFP(+)细胞是运输性白细胞或内皮细胞髓样细胞。为了探讨局部过度表达血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)可能增加掺入的BM-EPC的可能性,我们分析了经过基因操纵以过度表达VEGF的肿瘤(164)。局部VEGF的产生诱导骨髓来源的细胞的大量浸润,但没有导致这些细胞的血管壁整合。总的来说,这些发现表明,在肿瘤进展期间,血管形成主要通过经典的肿瘤血管生成(例如,先前存在的EC的发芽)发生,而BM-EPC没有在任何显着程度上并入血管壁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号