...
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of nursing: BJN >Audit of referrals for cataract extraction: are they appropriate?
【24h】

Audit of referrals for cataract extraction: are they appropriate?

机译:对白内障摘除转诊的审核:是否合适?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

AIM: To investigate the correlation between community cataract referral information and hospital ophthalmic opinion in order to assess if the referrals for cataract extraction are appropriate. The secondary aim is to identify if any streamlining of the service is indicated. METHOD: Patients referred from the community with a cataract were assessed with regard to the given referral data against the hospital ophthalmic opinion at their first outpatient assessment. RESULTS: Twenty-three (76.7%) patients referred with cataract were listed for a cataract extraction. The reason for not listing patients was due to lifestyle issues in 86% (n = 7) of cases. There proved to be no association (P = 0.62) between an indication of a compromised lifestyle on the referral letter and being listed for cataract surgery. CONCLUSION: Community cataract referral data only appears lacking in their consideration of patients' quality of life, which needs to be clarified prior to a hospital visit--either by better communicationwith the community optometrists or by contact with the patient. A nurse-led service receiving cataract referrals direct from the community is warranted if current practice uses multiple preoperative hospital visits.
机译:目的:调查社区白内障转诊信息与医院眼科意见之间的相关性,以评估转诊白内障的转诊是否合适。第二个目的是确定是否指示了服务的任何简化。方法:在首次门诊评估时,根据医院眼科意见评估了来自白内障社区的白内障患者的转诊数据。结果:23例(76.7%)白内障患者被列入白内障摘除术。未列出患者的原因是由于86%(n = 7)的患者的生活方式问题。在推荐信中表明生活方式受到影响与被列入白内障手术的证据之间没有关联(P = 0.62)。结论:社区白内障转诊数据仅缺乏对患者生活质量的考虑,需要在就诊之前进行澄清-通过与社区验光师更好地沟通或与患者接触。如果当前的做法是术前多次去医院看病,则应由护士领导的服务机构直接从社区接受白内障转诊。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号