首页> 外文期刊>International angiology: A journal of the International Union of Angiology >B-mode estimate of carotid stenosis: Planimetric measurements complement the velocity estimate of internal carotid stenosis
【24h】

B-mode estimate of carotid stenosis: Planimetric measurements complement the velocity estimate of internal carotid stenosis

机译:B型颈动脉狭窄的估计:平面测量补充了内部颈动脉狭窄的速度估计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aims. Velocity criteria for diagnosis of carotid stenosis are subject to flow phenomenon such as contralateral stenosis or occlusion. Duplex tri-axial diameter and cross sectional area measurements are potentially more accurate because they are anatomic. Methods. As part of a prospective study on triplanar ultrasound carotid stenosis measurements, 30 consecutive patients were studied by 3 independent operators to assess variability of the technique. PSV and EDV were recorded at the common and internal carotid arteries and Duplex B-mode long-axis and diameter views were obtained using color and/or power Doppler. Cross-sectional area (CSAS), minimal luminal diameter (MLD), and triaxial diameter measurements, based on the NASCET criteria were performed at the narrowest lumen. Results. The CSAS, MLD and triaxial diameter measurements were not significantly different in the 3 measurements and that was true for the 3 operators (ANOVA, P=0.1 for both). There were 4 patients where the velocity measurements differed by one stenosis grade, when compared to diameter. The triaxial diameter stenosis correlated well with the percent area reduction for all three measurements. Other than having a very good linear relationship (R2=0.95, R2=0.96, R2=0.93). The MLD was reduced with increasing grades of stenosis and provided a clear separation between the 50-69% and 80-99% grades with only a small overlap in the 70-79% grade. Conclusion. The present analysis demonstrates that CSAS and triaxial diameter can be performed by experienced investigators with low variability and good reproducibility. Velocity and planimetric measurements are complimentary in the assessment of carotid artery stenosis.
机译:目的诊断颈动脉狭窄的速度标准易受血流现象的影响,例如对侧狭窄或闭塞。双相三轴直径和横截面面积的测量可能更准确,因为它们是解剖学上的。方法。作为一项关于三瓣膜超声颈动脉狭窄测量的前瞻性研究的一部分,由3位独立的手术人员对30例连续患者进行了研究,以评估该技术的可变性。在颈总动脉和颈内动脉记录PSV和EDV,并使用彩色和/或功率多普勒仪获得双工B型长轴和直径视图。基于NASCET标准,在最窄的管腔上进行了横截面积(CSAS),最小管腔直径(MLD)和三轴直径测量。结果。 CSAS,MLD和三轴直径的测量值在3个测量值中没有显着差异,这对于3个操作员来说都是正确的(ANOVA,两者均为P = 0.1)。与直径相比,有4例患者的速度测量值不同,狭窄程度为一种狭窄。对于所有三个测量,三轴直径狭窄与面积减少百分比密切相关。除了具有非常好的线性关系(R2 = 0.95,R2 = 0.96,R2 = 0.93)。随着狭窄程度的增加,MLD降低,并且在50-69%和80-99%等级之间提供了清晰的分隔,而在70-79%等级中只有很小的重叠。结论。本分析表明,CSAS和三轴直径可以由经验丰富的研究人员进行,变异性低且重现性好。速度和平面测量是颈动脉狭窄评估的补充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号