首页> 外文期刊>Internal medicine. >Interference of (1 --> 3)-beta-D-glucan administration in the measurement of plasma (1 --> 3)-beta-D-glucan.
【24h】

Interference of (1 --> 3)-beta-D-glucan administration in the measurement of plasma (1 --> 3)-beta-D-glucan.

机译:(1-> 3)-β-D-葡聚糖给药对血浆(1-> 3)-β-D-葡聚糖测量的干扰。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料
  • 3)-beta-D-glucan administration in the measurement of plasma (1 --> 3)-beta-D-glucan.','sina');">新浪微博
  • QQ群
  • QQ空间
-->

    摘要

    OBJECTIVE: Blood (1 --> 3)-beta-D-glucan (betaG) measurement is widely used as an effective sero-diagnostic method for deep-seated mycosis. Antitumor betaG (lentinan, schizophyllan) administration is known as one of the false-positive factors of blood betaG measurement. To understand the influence of administered betaG preparation to betaG measurement in blood, we compared the interfering effect of betaG administration in different betaG measuring methods. METHODS: betaG concentration in plasma was measured by three different methods. MATERIALS: betaG concentration was measured in plasma of 18 samples of 7 cases with betaG administration and 86 samples without betaG administration. The period after last betaG administration was three days to three years. RESULTS: In the cases for which betaG was administered, blood betaG level drastically increased using the method which employs alkaline pretreatment. Even in the cases for which betaG was administered three years previously; betaG value measured by alkaline pretreatment was significantly high. Thus, interference of betaG administration in blood betaG measurement continued for years after the last administration. CONCLUSION: Disparity in betaG values measured by different methods for betaG administered cases is due to differences among sample pretreatment methods. Conformation of administered betaG seemed to be transformed into a sensitive form to factor G by alkaline pretreatment. Especially in the case of the alkaline pretreatment method, betaG administration disturbance was much stronger than for dilution-heating pretreatment. Therefore, in suspected cases, it is important to pay attention to betaG administration during the previous few years.
    机译:目的:血液(1-> 3)-β-D-葡聚糖(betaG)测量被广泛用作深部真菌病的有效血清学诊断方法。抗肿瘤βG(lentinan,schizophyllan)的给药被认为是血液βG测定的假阳性因素之一。为了了解所施用的betaG制剂对血液中betaG测量的影响,我们比较了在不同betaG测量方法中使用betaG的干扰效果。方法:采用三种不同的方法测量血浆中的betaG浓度。材料:测量了7例使用betaG的患者和86例未使用betaG的样品的血浆中的betaG浓度。上次BetaG给药后的时间为三天到三年。结果:在使用betaG的情况下,采用碱性预处理的方法可大大提高血液betaG的水平。即使在三年前使用betaG的情况下;通过碱性预处理测得的betaG值非常高。因此,在最后一次给药后的数年中,βG给药对血液βG测量的干扰持续存在。结论:对于不同的BetaG给药病例,通过不同方法测得的betaG值差异是由于样品预处理方法之间的差异所致。通过碱性预处理,似乎已将βG的构象转化为对G因子敏感的形式。特别是在碱性预处理方法的情况下,与稀释加热预处理相比,βG的给药干扰要强得多。因此,在可疑的情况下,在过去的几年中注意betaG的管理很重要。

    著录项

    相似文献

    • 外文文献
    • 中文文献
    • 专利
    获取原文

    客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

    京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
    • 客服微信

    • 服务号