首页> 外文期刊>Internal medicine journal >Two steps forward, one step back: advance care planning, Australian regulatory frameworks and the Australian Medical Association.
【24h】

Two steps forward, one step back: advance care planning, Australian regulatory frameworks and the Australian Medical Association.

机译:前进两步,后退一步:预先护理计划,澳大利亚监管框架和澳大利亚医学协会。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The Australian Medical Association has recently adopted a policy position concerning advance care planning, which is generally supportive of extending patient self-determination beyond the loss of decision-making capacity. It calls for uniform national legislation for legally enforceable advance health directives (AHD), and statutory protection for practitioners who comply with valid AHD, or who do not comply on several grounds. Analysis of the grounds for non-compliance indicate that they undermine patient autonomy, and aspects of the policy are inconsistent with current common law and statutory regimes that allow an adult to complete a legally binding AHD. The policy therefore threatens the patient self-determination, which it endorses, and places doctors who participate in advance care planning at legal risk.
机译:澳大利亚医学协会最近通过了一项有关预先护理计划的政策立场,该立场通常支持将患者的自决范围扩大到决策能力的丧失之外。它要求制定统一的国家法律以制定具有法律效力的预先医疗保健指示(AHD),并对遵守有效AHD或出于多种理由不遵守的从业者提供法定保护。对违规理由的分析表明,它们破坏了患者的自主权,并且该政策的某些方面与现行的普通法和成年法律相抵触,后者使成年人能够完成具有法律约束力的AHD。因此,该政策威胁到要批准的患者自决权,并使参与预先护理计划的医生面临法律风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号