首页> 外文期刊>Internal medicine journal >Knowledge, attitudes and experience associated with testing for prostate cancer: a comparison between male doctors and men in the community.
【24h】

Knowledge, attitudes and experience associated with testing for prostate cancer: a comparison between male doctors and men in the community.

机译:与前列腺癌检测相关的知识,态度和经验:社区中男性医生与男性之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Debate about testing for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE) continues. The evidence of benefit from screening for prostate cancer using PSA tests is inconclusive, and it is unclear how PSA can be used most effectively in the detection of prostate cancer. Given the lack of consensus, it is important that consumers understand the issues in a way that will permit them to decide whether or not to have a test and, if symptomatic, how their condition is managed. AIMS: To compare prostate cancer knowledge, attitudes and testing experiences reported by male doctors and men in the community, despite the lack of evidence of a benefit. METHODS: The primary method for ascertaining the attitudes of male doctors (MD) was a telephone survey, with some doctors electing to complete a written survey. Each MD was selected, at random, from a register of male practitioners aged > or = 49 years of age. A total of 266 MD participated in the survey. The community sample (CS) was accessed using a telephone survey. Five hundred male Victorian residents aged > or = 49 years of age participated in the study. RESULTS: Knowledge - Overall, 55% of the CS indicated correctly that prostate disease is sometimes cancer, compared to 83% of MD. Attitudes - Fifty-five per cent of MD believed men should be tested for prostate disease at least every 2 years, compared to 68% of men in the CS. Testing experience - Forty-five per cent of MD had been tested for prostate cancer in the past, and 92% of those tests were reported as negative. In the CS, 56% had been tested for prostate cancer in the past, and 78% of the results were reported as negative. The significant independent predictors of having had a prostate test among MD were: (i) age (> or = 60 years; odds ratio (OR): 1.59; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.30-1.88) and (ii) positive attitudes towards regular testing for prostate cancer (OR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.98-2.56). The significant independent predictors for the CS were:(i) age (> or = 60 years; OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.40-1.89), (ii) being married (OR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.00-1.60), (iii) knowledge that prostate disease was sometimes cancer (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.26-1.66) and (iv) positive attitudes towards regular testing for prostate cancer (OR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.90-2.34). CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight that testing for prostate cancer is widespread in the community and in the medical profession. Further research should be undertaken to identify how to help men make fully informed decisions about prostate cancer testing.
机译:背景:关于使用前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和直肠指检(DRE)进行前列腺癌测试的争论仍在继续。使用PSA检测筛查前列腺癌的益处尚无定论,目前尚不清楚如何在检测前列腺癌中最有效地使用PSA。鉴于缺乏共识,因此重要的是,消费者应理解问题,以使他们能够决定是否进行测试,以及是否有症状,如何管理其病情。目的:比较社区中男医生和男性报告的前列腺癌知识,态度和测试经验,尽管缺乏证据表明有益处。方法:确定男医生态度的主要方法是电话调查,有些医生选择完成书面调查。每个MD均从年龄大于或等于49岁的男性从业者名单中随机选择。共有266名医学博士参加了调查。使用电话调查访问了社区样本(CS)。年龄≥49岁的五百名维多利亚州男性居民参加了这项研究。结果:知识-总体而言,有55%的CS正确表示前列腺疾病有时是癌症,而MD的这一比例为83%。态度-55%的医学博士认为,男性至少应每两年进行一次前列腺疾病检查,而CS男性为68%。测试经验-过去有45%的MD测试过前列腺癌,其中92%的测试为阴性。在CS中,过去曾对56%的前列腺癌进行过测试,据报道78%的结果为阴性。在MD中进行前列腺测试的重要独立预测因素是:(i)年龄(>或= 60岁;优势比(OR):1.59; 95%置信区间(CI):1.30-1.88)和(ii)阳性定期检查前列腺癌的态度(OR:2.27; 95%CI:1.98-2.56)。 CS的重要独立预测因素是:(i)年龄(>或= 60岁; OR:1.65; 95%CI:1.40-1.89),(ii)已婚(OR:1.30; 95%CI:1.00-1.60 ),(iii)认识到前列腺疾病有时是癌症(OR:1.46; 95%CI:1.26-1.66)和(iv)对定期检查前列腺癌的积极态度(OR:2.12; 95%CI:1.90-2.34) 。结论:结果突出了前列腺癌的检测在社区和医学界中是普遍的。应该进行进一步的研究,以确定如何帮助男性做出有关前列腺癌检测的充分知情的决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号